Laserfiche WebLink
if the ground surface is disturbed by salvage logging or <br />grazing. Many monitoring studies have found lower <br />cover of native plants in areas with high seeded grass <br />cover, even where seedingincreased total cover. Some- <br />timea thiaresulted inlower total cover after the seeded <br />grass decreased in abundance. On the other hand, <br />seeded grass may also inhibit growth of noxious weeds <br />that invade sites after fire, a beneficial outcome. Rhi- <br />zomatous (sod-forming) grasses make reforestation <br />more difficult if they achieve significant cover. It is <br />important to know the composition of prefire vegeta- <br />tion when proposing to seed - if the vegetation in- <br />cluded many annuals or lots of perennial grass or <br />sedge, there will usually be considerable cover eatab- <br />liehed naturally after a fire. <br />Other factors Many respondents noted that grass <br />seeding was sometimes done primarily for "political" <br />reasons, especially at the wildland-urban interface. <br />Ground Seedine <br />Purpose. Ground seeding is done in localized areas of <br />high burn intensity where reeetabliehing plant cover <br />quickly is essential, such as riparian areas, above <br />lakes and reservoirs, or highly productive forest land. <br />Annual or perennial grasses, usually non-native pas- <br />ture grasses or cereal grains, and non-native legumi- <br />nous forba,aretypically used. Ground seeding assures <br />more even seed application than aerial seeding and <br />sometimes includes treatments to cover the eeed, <br />which enhances germination. Seed is applied from all- <br />terrain vehicles or by hand. <br />Relatrve Etlectrveness Excellent-9% Good-82% Fair- <br />9% Poor-0% (Replies = 11) <br />Ground eeeding was judged "good" in effectiveness by <br />moat interviewees. Aa with aerial seeding, the post- <br />fire weather pattern frequently determines the effec- <br />tiveness of cover production by seeded grass. high <br />winds may blow seed off site. First rains can wash ash <br />and seed from the hillslope, or they may be gentle <br />enough to stimulate germination. Use of a rangeland <br />drill, raking, or mulch to cover seed increases success. <br />One forest used cattle to trample seed into the ground <br />and break up a hydrophobic layer. Non-native species, <br />especially perennial grasses, grow well, sometimes too <br />well, and provide persistent Grover. Cereal grains dis- <br />appear in a few years. <br />Implementaton andEnvironmental Factors Timing of <br />seed application is essential to success; optimum timing <br />depends onlocal weather pattern. The seed mixmustbe <br />adapted to the soil type. Awned or very light seeds <br />spread more easily ifrice hulls (or similar material) are <br />included in the mix. Grass grewthis beat on lower angle <br />elopes (less likely to wash away). Protection from cattle <br />grazing the first year ie considered by some to be the <br />biggest factor in success; protection for 2 or 3 years is <br />good. Elk may have a negative effect on seeded grasses <br />as well. <br />Seeding Plua Fertilizer <br />Purpose. Seeding plus fertilization is done to increase <br />total vegetation cover quickly on a burned elope. Occa- <br />sionally fertilizer alone is applied to enhance natural <br />regeneration. <br />Relative effectrveness Excellent-25% Good-0% Fair- <br />50% Poor-25% (Replies = 4) <br />Fertilization received mixed reviews among the four <br />respondents. As with seeding, timing of application <br />and poet-fire weather pattern are important to auc- <br />ceae. Fertilizationismainly done in the Northwest and <br />ammonium sulfate is most commonly used. One re- <br />spondent reported that greener strips were apparent <br />in the seeded area where the fertilizer had been <br />applied. Pelleted seed, containing a small amount of <br />fertilizer, may be easier to apply than uncoated seed. <br />Implementation and Envlronmenta] Factors Along <br />riparian areas slow release fertilizer has been used to <br />m;n;m;~n leaching into waterways. There is evidence <br />that fertilizer may inhibit or depress mycorrhizae <br />formation. <br />Contour-Felled I,oga (I.og Erosion Barriers. I.og Ter- <br />races. Terracettesl <br />Purpose. Contour-felled loge reduce water velocity, <br />break up concentrated flows, and induce hydraulic <br />reughnesa to burned watersheds. Sediment storage ie <br />a secondary objective. The potential volume of sedi- <br />ment stored ie highly dependent on elope, the size and <br />length of the felled trees, and the degree to which the <br />felled trees are adequately staked and placed into <br />ground contact. <br />Relatrve Etl`ectrveness Excellent-29% Good-37% Fair- <br />14% Poor-20% (Replies = 35) <br />The effectiveness of contour-felling covered the epec- <br />trumfrom "excellent" to "poor," although more ratings <br />were "excellent" or "good" (66 percent) than "fair" or <br />"poor" (34 percent) (table 16). Some personnel re- <br />ported 100 percent of loge functioning, while others <br />reported 0 percent functioning. Site conditions, instal- <br />lation quality, climate, and the quality of materials <br />are major factors in determining relative effective- <br />ness. In some instances contour-felled log barriers <br />have filled with sediment following the first storm <br />event after installation, while others have taken 1 to <br />2 years to fill. <br />Implementatron and Environmental Factors Gocd <br />planning, proper implementation, and knowledge of <br />environmental factors are crucial to the success of <br />USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-63.2000 75 <br />