Laserfiche WebLink
PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />Stockponds or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Rov Karo <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Stockoond <br />SITE NAME: T-2 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II <br />MINE I.D. NO.: C-80-005 <br />DATE: 06/26/96 <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 03/14/96 <br />LOCATION: SES:SW'/.. Sec 2. TSN. R87W <br />LOCATION: 7.1 mi SE of Hayden. CO <br />OWNER'S REP.: Brad Brown. Gen Mar <br />Circle or write in soorooriate rasoonae <br />1. Angle of slope: 2:1 upstream, 2.75:1 downstream Total = 4.75:1 N/A <br />2. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes o N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes N N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes N N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes No N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes No N/A <br />3. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes ~ N/A <br />9. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes ~ N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes ~ N/A <br />6. •Major erosion problems: es No N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes ® N/A <br />8. •Erosion of toe: Yes ~ N/A <br />9. •Water impounded against downstream toe: Yes No N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: Aooroximately 2 feet <br />11. Increase Decrease in water level: No chance feet <br />12. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes ~ N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: es No N/A <br />14. •Clogginq <br /> <br /> Spillway channels: Yes ~ N/A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes o N/A <br />*Maj or adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse <br />conditions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, <br />etc.) in the space on the back of this sheet. <br />