My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE48540
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE48540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:50:30 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:39:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001015
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/11/2001
From
LAS ANIMAS CNTY ROAD & BRIDGE
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 DIVISION O F <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 MINERAL S <br />FAA: (303)832-8106 & <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> RECLAMATION <br /> MINING•SAFETY <br /> Bill Owrns <br /> Governor <br />May I, 2001 Greg E. Walther <br /> Executive Direcor <br />Mr. Phil Dorenkam , Su ervisor <br />P P Michael B. Lung <br /> Divsion Director <br />Las Animas County Road and Bridge Dept. <br />2000 N. Linden <br />Trinidad, COS 1032 <br />RE: Sandoval L & C Co. Pit (File M-2001-015) Review of County adequacy response <br />Dear Mr. Dorenkamp: <br />The Division has reviewed the Couny's adequacy response received by fax transmission on April 27, 2001 and has identified the <br />following remaining adequacy concern: <br />NOTICES: The newspaper notice of the application made for the Sandoval Pit, apparently published on April 17, 2001, <br />indicates that comments on the application must be received by the Division by 4:00 p.m. on April 26, 2001. Rule 1.7.2(2) (and <br />your application directions) specify that the public comment period ends 10 days after the last date of the newspaper publication. <br />The notice the County published allowed only 9 days for comment. <br />The County must publish another notice of the application and indicate that written public comments, in order to be <br />considered, must be received by the Division within 10 days after the date of that publicntion. Proof of that new public notice <br />must then be supplied to the Division. (Because a new public notice oFthe application is required, the provisions of Rule 1.6.6 <br />now apply which means that all deadlines applicable to the application shall begin to run anew. As a result, a new decision date <br />of June 6, 2001 has now been set fur the application. Since the application is in all other respects approvable, assuming the <br />original adequacy response and associated materials are received by the Division, the Division will not necessarily delay its <br />decision until June 6, 2001. The Division, however, will not make its' decision until the required 10 day puhlic comment period <br />associated with the new public notice has expired, and any new adequacy issues requiring resolution and identified during the <br />new public comment period are addressed.] <br />NOTICES: The Division will accept the evidence provided that the co-owners of the surface and mineral rights to the <br />!and to be affected by the operation have been notified of the application, provding the copies o; ;he notice with the original <br />signatures of the co-owners arc provided. <br />REMAINDER OF ADEQUACY RESPONSE: The Division will accept the County's responses in regard to Exhibits B, <br />C, E and F as adequate, providing the original adequacy response is supplied. <br />NOTE: As a result of the necessity for the County to publish a new newspaper notice of the application, the new decision <br />date for the application is officially set as June 6, 2001. Please respond fully to the above identified adequacy issues well <br />enough in advance of that date that the Division will be able to review the response, deal with any remaining concerns, <br />and consider approval of the application at least by that time. Should you no[ be able to respond fully by June li, 2001, <br />please provide a written waiver of the County's right to a decision on that date in order to avoid a denial of the <br />application and to allow the permitting process to continue. <br />If you have any questions of the above, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />.,.1~.~ GS-~-~-~ <br />Janlcs C. Stevens <br />Sr. Specialist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.