My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE48500
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE48500
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:50:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:38:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/21/2001
Doc Name
STATEMENT OF ISSUES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' (E) All other wetlands which are state waters shall be subject only to the <br /> narrative standards set forth in section 31.11, unless the Commission <br /> has adopted the wetlands classification and appropriate numeric <br /> standards. <br /> (F) The issuance and use of site-specific or individual permits under section <br />' 404 of the Clean Water Act, is not precluded by the provisions of <br /> sections 31.7, 31.11 or 31.13, except as provided in the 401 certification <br /> process under section 25-8-302, C.R.S. <br />' <br /> (G) Wetlands water quality standards and classifications shall not be <br /> interpreted or applied in a manner that is inconsistent with sections 25- <br />' 8-102(5) and 25-8-104, C.R.S. <br /> (c) Site-Specific Narrative Standards <br />' (i) Narrative standards may be assigned by the Commission to apply on a <br /> specific state surface water where numeric criteria are not required under <br /> federal law. Narrative standards will be assigned based on the evidence <br /> presented at the classification and numeric-standards-setting hearings, and <br />' must protect the classified uses. <br />' (ii) The Commission may adopt asite-specific narrative standard where water <br />quality currently is degraded as a result of historical mining activities and <br /> improvement is likely within 20 years, if it determines that such a standard is <br /> the most appropriate option to protect existing uses and to promote water <br />' quality improvement efforts for the segment(s) in question due to uncertainty <br /> regarding what water quality is attainable. Unless the Commission <br /> determines that a different approach is appropriate on asite-specific basis, it <br /> shall use a statement that the standard(s) for the pollutant(s) in question shall <br /> be the chemical concentrations, biological conditions, and/or physical <br /> conditions identified by a structured scientific use attainability analysis, or <br /> table value standards, if the use attainability analysis is not completed and <br /> submitted by a specified date and approved by the Commission. Generally, a <br /> numerical temporary modification based on existing ambient quality will also <br />' be adopted for the segment(s) and pollutant(s) in question. <br /> (2) Considerations in Assioninp Standards <br />' In promulgating water quality standards, the Commission shall consider: <br /> (a) The need for standards which regulate specified pollutants; <br />' <br /> (b) Such information as may be available to the Commission as to the degree to which <br /> any particular type of pollutant is subject to treatment; the availability, practicality, <br /> and technical and economic feasibility of treatment techniques; the impact of <br /> treatment requirements upon water quantity; and the extent to which the discharge <br /> to be controlled is significant; <br />' (c) The continuous, intermittent, or seasonal nature of the pollutant to be controlled; <br />' <br /> 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.