My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE48482
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE48482
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:50:26 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:37:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
LINCOLN DEVORE LETTER DATED 02/05/97
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05-E4 Part 4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ralaz R, Associates <br />• .`lew r.oal wasr.e Pile Project., Sanborn Creek Mine, Somerset, CO <br />Fel,rnarv 5, 1997 Page 2 <br />~I r•. Rill Balaz, PE, }ias reworked the road alignments to fit the <br />slopes as a refinement of the oz•iginal, preliminary road plan. <br />T:~c relative amounte of cut and fill have changed somewhat and <br />the heights of most of the cuts and. Pills has been decreased. <br />Specific road sections will be analyzed for slope failure as a <br />part of the final report. <br />Sediment Collection Pond: The proposed sedi- <br />ment eollec.tion pond, at the toe oP the proposed new wacee pile, <br />is ylaced in a ancient nlluvial/colluvisl filled gully. The <br />closer t}ze actual embankment is toward the railroad right-of-way, <br />the deeper t}ie gulf- becomes, exceeding 16 feet in the explora- <br />tion pit, excavated to observe the soil Yill, as witnessed b}• <br />versorrnel ~f ~~estec and Lineoln DeVore. Providing proper benring <br />and att.aclrinent. Lc; I.}rc sandsto:e Tully sides for the embankment is <br />not judged Lo Le a significant problem, however, some soil con- <br />solidation end probable 'piping' of the soil by water movement <br />under the embankment must be anLic:ipaled. It is possible to over' <br />excavate the soils in the e~nbanl.nrent and pond area and recompact <br />Lhem to achieve soil of low to very low pez•meability. It must be <br />emphasized ttrat if the over excavation and r•ecompaction is not <br />• done properly and completely, piping and some soil subsidence may <br />still occur. <br />7t. is recommended this area be over excavated a minimum of 2 feet <br />and the soils properly wetted and recompacted beneath the embank- <br />ment anti the pond ax•ea. Due to the presence of significant <br />amounts of cobble and boulder sized roclt fragments, achieving <br />propaz• and .complete compaction may be somewhat difficult. There- <br />fore, it is recommended that a geosynthetic liner (for example, <br />Hypalonl b? rrtili2ed as the primary pond seal. Protection of <br />this liner will probably require 1 to 2 feet of a soil top cover- <br />ing of t}re liner. <br />goal 1:asCe Piie oe A:•ea: 1'he exploration pit for <br />the proposed sediment pond also indicated the sandstone oP the <br />'Rollins' Sandstone is quite competent in this area brrt, the Lap <br />oC 1. },e sancist.one unit appears to be 20 to 30 feet higher in <br />elevation than anticipated in the WESTEC Report. The toe area <br />of t}re coal waste pile will be placed or. a downhill sloping <br />surface of t'ne Rollins sandstone. It is recommended the Rollins <br />~anclstone he excavated in the *_oe area, a minimum of 3 Peet deep <br />t.+~ F feet. wide, across tF,e bottom and sides oP the toe area. <br />This excavated keyway will have to be discontinuous at the lowest <br />Uo:•tion of tl,e toe area, where the t,nderdrain at the base of the <br />coal waste pile passes througtr the toe and Snto the sediment pond <br />area. F..xc-avation of this keyway may require minor amounts of <br />hlact.ing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.