Laserfiche WebLink
~. <br /> <br />~II II~~II~II~~I~ I~~ <br />sss <br />interoffice memo <br />Date: 10/28/98 <br />To: Tellier File; Permit No. M-98-058 <br />From: Erica Crosby ~~ <br />kJ <br />RE: Phone conversation with Elizabeth Miller of Division of Wildlife <br />10/28/98- 1 Spoke with Elizabeth Miller of DOW regarding impacts of the proposed project to <br />existing wildlife. In her letter dated 12/9/97, she stated that 4 weeks of the crusher in operation <br />would minimize [he amount of detrimental impact the operation would have on the surrounding <br />wildlife. 71te DOW states that there are no significant environmental or wildlife impacts from the <br />proposed gravel operation. <br />The Anderson's objection letter dated September 21, 1998 states that a new wildlife impact statement <br />is needed because the actual period of time approved for the crusher is set at 50 days/ per year or 10 <br />weeks. Ms. Miller stated that the 50 days/year or 10-weeks vs. 4 weeks would not change the <br />recommendations stated in her letter or requve a new wildlife impact statement. <br />10/28/98 Confidential <br />