My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE48284
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE48284
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:50:14 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:31:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Also Attachment 2.04.10-1 Location of Reference Areas
Section_Exhibit Name
NH2 1996 SECTION 2.04.10 VEGETATION INFO NH2 STUDY AREA 1987 AND 1999
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
composition. Several rock ridges with shallow soils also occur in these fields, further reducing <br />potential production. Burbridge, who does not fertilize his hay fields, has little alfalfa in the stand, <br />and significant areas of shallow soils with rock ridges. Combined, these result in a potentially <br />low level of productivity in his hay fields. However the hay production from this field is adequate <br />to meet Burbridge's needs and thus the incentive for more intensified management is not there. <br />It should be pointed out that Burbridge's cut hay was rained on twice and turned twice before <br />baling which will reduce both the yield and quality of hay. Staats' hay production values, though <br />higher than most first cuttings, still does not reflect the potential production. Because of land <br />leveling on Staats' fields, cut areas (exposing subsoil materials with lower production potential) <br />have lower overall yields, though irrigation water management is benefited. Staats' fields (in the <br />proposed permit area) north of Galamity Draw are not intensively managed because of more <br />productive and easier managed fields south of Calamity Draw, and an already adequate hay <br />base provided from these latter fields. Staats' fields which were included in this study are not <br />fertilized on a regular basis, irrigation water application is not consistent during the growing <br />season, and the fields are grazed during the non-growing season. This reflects management <br />during the last several years. A portion of Garvey's hay fields were renovated in 1986 and <br />• herbicides were applied to control persistent perennial weeds such as Canada thistle and <br />quackgrass. The fields have not been fertilized for several years, some areas of shallow or <br />boggy soils occur in part of the fields, alfalfa composition in some of the older fields is low, and <br />the hay fields were grazed during the winter and into the early growing season. These factors all <br />combined to reduce production below the potential in Garvey's fields. <br />In summarizing the type, varying site characteristics, individual management objectives, II <br />applied management, and number of cuttings, result in wide ranges in production for the type. <br />Based on the 1987 field data collection, only one operator at this time manages for sustained <br />production during the growing season that approaches the potential of the site. <br />SwalelDrainge Tvae. Flood irrigation of lands on and adjacent to the study area has created <br />water regimes in certain locations that favor the establishment of hydrophytic and phreatophytic <br />vegetation (see Figure 4-5, Peabody Appendix 10-4). These situations occur where: 1) small <br />natural drainages or swales (with gentle slopes) collect tailwater drainage from the surrounding <br />irrigated fields; 2) shallow ground water, augmented by irrigation, daylights along exposed <br />• (REVISED 8115100) 2.04.10 - 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.