Laserfiche WebLink
~ iii iiniiiiiiiu iii <br />STATE , <br />OF <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DepartmeN of Natural Resources <br />131 i Sherman Si.. Ruom ? 15 <br />Denver, Coloraria 80207 <br />DIVISION OF <br />Pnone: ao7) aeb-7sa~ MINERAL S <br />FAX: 1303) A}2-8I Ob & <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> REC LA MA710N <br /> MINING•SAFETY <br />DATE: September 6, 1999 <br /> Bill Owens <br /> <br />TO: Gregg Squire Governor <br /> Greg E. Walther <br /> E.ecwrve Dvenor <br />FROM: Allen Sorenson Michael B. Long <br /> Dimuon Director <br />RE: Conditions for Approval, Connell Resources, <br />Timnath Connell Pit, File No. M-99-050 <br />Based on a review of the responses to the Division's adequacy review, the following is a discussion of <br />the issues to be resolved through conditions placed on the application approval and a list of proposed <br />stipulations. <br />Ground Water Interception and Delivery <br />The applicant has committed to the installation and operation of a ground water interception and <br />deiivery system to maintain ambient water table elevations in the vicinity of [he pit. This plan, if <br />properly installed, maintained, and operated, will be effective. However, the plan is qualitative and <br />may be difficult to enforce. For example, the plan states that "The six monitoring wells installed on site <br />will be used for monitoring ground water levels for the operation of the drain system," but provides no <br />criteria for triggering the routing of ground water or water pumped from the pit to either the infiltration <br />ponds or the river. It is my understanding that the Party to the Board's consideration of this application <br />is satisfied with the plan, thus providing a sound basis for the Division's recommendation to approve. <br />Slope Stability Issues <br />The applicant has provided stability analyses and recommended mining setbacks for the roads and <br />irrigation ditches at the pit. The applicant provides ajustification for assumptions used in the stability <br />analyses that states, in part, that "The critical slope failure for a gravel highwall will occur in the gravel <br />and not in the bedrock." While the Division does not agree with the applicant's rationale relative to the <br />potential for bedrock failures, it has been determined that the proposed setbacks are adequate for <br />stability. It should be noted that although the irrigation ditches should be stable against slope failure <br />with the 25 foot setback, mining and dewatering within ZS feet may increase seepage losses from the <br />ditch. It is also important to note that the 35-foot setbacks specified for protection of roads are to be <br />measured to the right-of-way lines, not necessarily to the edge of the roadways. <br />For future reference, a discussion of the potential for bedrock involvement in slope failures at gravel <br />pits is provided here. When shale bedrock is unloaded by extraction of overlying material, stress relief <br />