Laserfiche WebLink
PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />Stockponda or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Rov Karo <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Stockoond <br />SITE NAME: T-10 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II <br />MINE I.D. NO.: C-80-005 <br />DATE: 03/10/97 <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 12/16/96 <br />LOCATION: NEY.SWy, Sec 12. TSN. R87W <br />LOCATION: _7.1 mi SE of Hayden, CO <br />OWNER'S REP.: Brad Brown. Gen Mar <br />Circle or write in aoorooriate response <br />1. Angle of slope: 2:1 upstream, 3:1 downstream Total = 5:1 N/A <br />2. +Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes ® N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes ~ N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes ^ <br />~ N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes ® N/A <br />3. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes ® N/A <br />9. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes ~g N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes o N/A <br />6. +Maj or erosion problems: Yes ~ N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes ~ N/A <br />8. +Erosion of toe: Yes ® N/A <br />9. +Water impounded against downstream toe: Yes // <br />~nvo~ N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: Approximately 2 feet <br />11. Increase Decrease in water level: No chance feet <br />12. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes ~Q6~ N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: Yes ~(N!9•(' N/A <br />14. •Clogging <br /> /}-~ <br /> Spillway channels: Yes lNn~ N/A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes ® N/A <br />•Maj or adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse <br />conditions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, <br />etc.) in the space on the back of this sheet. <br />