My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO20217
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO20217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:41:36 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:25:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
10/6/1992
Doc Name
QTRLY SEDIMENTATION POND INSPECTIONS SENECA II-W MINE
From
PEABODY WESTERN
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
SEDIMENT POND INSPECTIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br />PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />Water, Sediment, or Slurry Impoundments <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Tom Wainwrioht DATE: 09/23/92 <br />NPDES I.D. NO.: CO-0000221 D.P. 006 <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Cross-Valley-P~nd DATE LAST INSPECTION: New Pond <br />SITE NAME: Pond .#009 LOCATION: SE'/~ SW'/. Sec 11, T5 N, R88W <br />MINE NAME: Seneca Mine II-W Peabody Coa Co LOCATION: 8 mi. S of Hayden, C <br />MINE I.D. NO.: CMLRD Permit No. C-82-057 OWNER'S REP.: Scott Williams. Suot. <br /> <br />Circle or write in appropriate response <br />1. Foundation preparation (removal of vegetation, stumps, topsoil): _ es No N/A <br />2. Lift thickness: 12 in. N/A <br />3. Compaction according to approved plan: es No N/A <br />4. Burning (specify extent and location): Yes No U <br />5. Angle of slope: 3:1 upstream, 3:1 downstream Total = 6:1 N/A <br />6. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br />From underdrain pipes: Yes No N/ <br />At isolated paints on embankment slopes: Yes ®o N/A <br />At natural hillside: Yes ® N/A <br />Over widespread areas: Yes ~ N/A <br />From downstream foundation area: Yes ~o~ N/A <br />"Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes ~ Pl/A <br />7. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes ®o N/A <br />8. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes ®o N/A <br />9. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes to N/A <br />10. *Major erosion problems: Yes ® N/A <br />11. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes ~o N/A <br />12. *Erosion of toe: Yes l~ N/A <br />13. *Water impounded against toe: Yes No N/A <br />14. Existing embankment freeboard: 20.2 feet <br />15. Increase Decrease in water level: See comments feet <br />16. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes !o N/A <br />17. Visible sumps or sinkholes in slurry surface: Yes ~o N/A <br />18. *Clogging <br />Spillway channels and pipes: Yes No N A <br />Decant system: Yes No / <br />Diversion ditches: Yes No /A <br />19. *Cracking or crushing of pipes <br />Spillway pipes: Yes ©o NLA <br />Decant system: Yes No ~/ <br />20. Trash racks clear and in place: es No N/A <br />*Flajor adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be repor ted t o the <br />Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse condition s <br />noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, etc. ) in the <br />space on the back of this sheet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.