Laserfiche WebLink
37 <br />tier of sections, Secs 1, 2, 3, 4, TSn, R90w, and Sec. 6, TSn, R89w, <br />were field checked and rejected on the basis of slope and/or vegeta- <br />tion. The linear outline of the surveyed area in this portion <br />of the lease reflects the nature of the terrain. Survey was performed <br />along drainage bottoms but not on the steep slopes adjacent to them. <br />The areas indicated as "Plot field checked", in Sec s 29, 27, and <br />26, T6n, R90w, were not surveyed because the landowner refused access. <br />Sec. 12, TSn, R90w was overlooked, and, as it appeared to meet the sur- <br />vey criteria in map inspection, should have been surveyed. This error <br />was not detected until after the crew had returned to fort Collins. <br />Site Distribution <br />Only one site, 5P1F319, was encountered in the survey of Tract 2. <br />This site, the remains of an historic architectural site, is again the <br />result of Euro-American occupation, The single structure is in very <br />poor condition. <br />Tract 9 <br />Environment <br />This tract (Fig. 4) is not greatly different from Tract 2, in that <br />it includes very little terrain that does, not incline steeply. The sur- <br />face has been uplifted on its southern edge and has a general dip to the <br />north. The area has experienced considerable erosion, however, and ex- <br />hibits an extensive array of gulches, canyons, and narrow valleys. Most <br />of these trend in a northerly direction, especially in the northern <br />half of the tract. <br /> <br />