My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47910
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:21:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
& Predication of Subsidence Southwestern District /3/14/94
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 07f Rockfall Hazard Assessment and Selection of Hazard Control or Mitigation Measures
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Construction of 10-foot or 20-foot high berms over sections of the road that <br />could be relocated <br />• Construction of 10-foot high berms starting approximately 30 feet from the <br />road in the direction of the cliff, for sections of the road that could not be <br />temporarily relocated. <br />• Excavation of a 10 foot deep trench in combination with a 10-foot high <br />berm, for sections of the road that could not be temporarily relocated. <br />CRSP runs were performed for each of the sections located within the study area and for <br />each of the applicable alternative catch area/berm configurations. Results are presented <br />in Appendices A and C and discussed below. <br />4.2 Analysis Results <br />Figure 4-2 shows the format used for summarizing the results for both existing conditions <br />and for each of the applicable catch area/berm configurations. The upper sketch <br />• illustrates the gradient of the cliff and foreslope used in each simulation and the location <br />of the "blown-up" section incorporating the road (shown in color). Results of each <br />simulation are shown in the four "blown-up" sections: <br />1. The upper, left hand sketch shows results for the section without mitigation. <br />2. The lower left hand sketch shows the results for mitigation using a trench <br />and berm. <br />3. The upper right hand sketch shows results for mitigation using a 10-foot <br />high berm <br />4. The lower right hand sketch shows results for mitigation using a 20-foot <br />high berm <br />The percent of boulders passing through each zone are presented above each of the <br />"blown-up" sections. In this example, the simulation resulted in: <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.