My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47910
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:21:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
& Predication of Subsidence Southwestern District /3/14/94
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 07f Rockfall Hazard Assessment and Selection of Hazard Control or Mitigation Measures
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Using true spacings, all three-set block-forming combinations of S1, S2, S3 and S4 were <br />The results of this analysis, in the form of a cumulative probability distribution, are <br />presented in Figure 3-1, together with the cumulative distribution of block sizes from the <br />boulder catalog. The results are in good agreement, and converge well in terms of the <br />larger block sizes. Based on this analysis, a worst case block size of about 6000 cubic <br />feet is considered appropriate for rockfall hazard assessment. An 'equivalent' disk, with a <br />diameter of 26 ft, a thickness of 11 ft, and a volume of 5840 cu.ft. was used in the CRSP <br />runs described in Section 3.3. In the boulder catalog, blocks 620 and B49 have similar <br />dimensions and volumes. <br />analysed to obtain the frequency distribution of resulting block sizes. Experience has <br />shown that many discontinuity sets have a spacing distribution which approximates <br />reasonably to a negative exponential form (Priest and Hudson, 1976, Priest and Hudson, <br />1981), and this was assumed to apply in the present case. The negative exponential <br />distribution is asingle-parameter distribution which is completely defined by its mean, so <br />provided the mean spacing is known, the full range of probabilities can be estimated. <br />Analysis of the bedding plane data indicated a log normal spacing distribution. Using <br />these distributions, the potential discontinuity combinations and resulting block sizes were <br />analysed using probabilistic modelling software. <br />3.2 Model Calibration and Parameter Selection <br />Prior to the main hazard assessment, a number of trial runs were carried out to calibrate <br />the CRSP model, and select appropriate site-specific slope surface parameters. These <br />calibration runs were carried out on sections of the slope where previous rockfalls <br />provided a basis for comparing observed and predicted behavior. <br />• Typical block sizes were determined from the boulder catalog for each calibration section. <br />These block sizes were converted to equivalent disks or cylinders for input to the CRSP <br />is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.