My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47910
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:21:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
& Predication of Subsidence Southwestern District /3/14/94
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 07f Rockfall Hazard Assessment and Selection of Hazard Control or Mitigation Measures
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 2.3 SAIC Data <br />SAIC stereographic projection data was replotted prior to the field work. These plots were <br />reviewed in the field in the course of carrying out the scanline surveys described below, <br />and were found to be representative of conditions in situ. <br />2.4 scanline Survey <br />Significant lengths of the main cliff face of the Twentymile sandstone outcrop present an <br />apparently massive, unjointed appearance. However, recent failures of the face in <br />response to undermining by Panel No. 6 confirm that significant jointing is present, <br />resulting in the formation of a variety of block sizes, some of which are very large. Closer <br />inspection reveals that jointing is generally present in the Twentymile sandstone outcrop, <br />although weathering or surface patina tend to obscure these features in many areas. <br />• Although the intent was to base the design block size primarily on the boulder catalog, it <br />was deemed necessary to make an estimate of the block size distribution in the cliff <br />faces, to ensure that the boulder catalog was representative and, in particular, that the <br />potential for block sizes significantly larger than indicated by the catalog was minimal. <br />Conventional scanline surveys involve logging all of the discontinuities which intersect a <br />selected line between known points. This line is typically provided by a tape measure or <br />string run between the end points. In the present case this approach was precluded by <br />the irregular nature of the topography at the base of the cliff, and the relatively wide joint <br />spacing which dictated the use of long scanlines to provide representative data. In view <br />of these limitations, the approach adopted was simply to walk sections of the cliff and <br />assign each joint encountered to one of the sets identified on the SAIC stereoplot (Figure <br />2-1). In the case of S2 (bedding plane) joints, absolute spacings were estimated in a <br />• number of cliff sections, and the results combined to obtain spacing frequency distribution <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.