My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO20043
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO20043
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:41:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/25/1998
Doc Name
WEST ELK GEOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT OBSERVATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS
From
HARRY POSEY
To
DAVE BERRY
Permit Index Doc Type
OTHER SURFACE WATER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the fault waters have much less. This implies that both have a young atmospheric carbon <br />component. <br />The higher pmc in the sump water implies the sump water has more modern water <br />than the seep water. This implies further that there must be an older water diluting the <br />sump water between the sump and the seep, assuming of course that the sump water is the <br />source of the seep, or that the seep water did not evolve directly from the sump water that <br />was collected. Neither interpretation appears to be favored. <br />The tritium ('H) values for most of the samples, both fault, sump and seep, <br />generally record some component of "post-bomb" water. a few of the fault waters do not. <br />Again, the greater amount of deuterium in the sump requires an expla~ration similar to <br />that provided for the "C values, namely that there is either a second source of "old" water <br />between the sump and the seep, or the sump water is not representative of water that <br />possibly recharges the seep. Overall, the greater abundance of "bomb" water in the sump <br />and seep relative to the fault implies that the faults contain a higher abundance of non- <br />bomb, i.e. old, water. Nonetheless, the presence of any "bomb" water in tl~e faults <br />implies either a relatively young age a mixture of old and young waters. This supports <br />the notion, presented above under the oxygen isotope discussion, that recharge ma}~ be <br />relatively rapid, in this case, possibly less than 50 years. <br />Summary <br />Overall, the geochemical information supports an interpretation that waters from <br />the faults in the West Elk mine, combined with meteoric water which has acquired some <br />dissolved constituents en route to the Northwest panels sump, is leaking across the B- <br />seam dam between the Bear Mine and West Elk Mine underground workings and out the <br />Edwards Portal seep. Dilution of the fault water with meteoric water explains most of the <br />trends in major element composition as well as the shifts in carbon, oxygen, and <br />hydrogen isotope compositions. Younger carbon-14 and tritium ages in the sump and <br />seep can be ascribed to the presence of more modern waters in these areas than the faults. <br />Sulfur isotope shifts require incorporation of sulfate which was probably derived from a <br />source area undergoing sulfate reduction. Gas compositions support the notion that <br />modem water is a component the fault waters. The constant temperature of the seep <br />indicates that, provided the sump water is the source of the seep water, [he sump is being <br />constantly replenished with hot fault waters. There is evidence that the sump waters <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.