My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47862
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47862
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:52 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Name
APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION PERMIT WESTERN MOBILE NORTHERN INC LOVELAND PIT FN M-2000-034
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Comment #5: The proposed pit is not compatible with existing and proposed residential uses in <br />the azea. <br />DMG Position: The decision as to whether a gravel pit is an acceptable land use in a particulaz <br />location rests with the local land use authority. The concern with the compatibility of the pit <br />with surrounding uses is outside the Board's jurisdiction, and should be pursued with [he local <br />land use authority. It is also noted that there are numerous reclaimed gravel pits in the <br />immediate vicinity, and a number of active pits. A lazge portion of the proposed permit area has <br />been used for many years as a public sale sand and gravel yard and concrete plant. <br />Comment #6: Objection to the proposed location of the asphalt batch plant primarily as an issue <br />of land use compatibility. <br />DMG Position: Land use compatibility issues are not within the Board's jurisdiction. The <br />decision as to whether a gravel pit is an acceptable land use in a particulaz location rests with the <br />local land use authority. The Board is primarily concerned with the reclamation of mined land <br />and the minimization of environmental impacts during mining. The objector is encouraged to <br />pursue land use compatibility concems with the County. <br />Comment t17: Objection to the proposed location of the asphalt batch plant as an issue of public <br />health, safety, and welfare. <br />DMG Position: This is an issue that is within the Boards jurisdiction. The objector was <br />encouraged to be more specific as to the nature of your concems for them to be considered in the <br />permitting process. The following issues aze pertinent and were provided to the objector: <br />- The primary health concern that may be associated with an asphalt batch plant is air <br />pollution. However, all asphalt batch plants in the State of Colorado must obtain and <br />comply with the requirements of an Air Pollution Emission Notice issued by the <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. <br />- Another health and welfare concem that is attributed to asphalt plants is noise. As stated <br />previously, the appropriateness of the location for a gravel pit and appurtenances such as <br />asphalt plants is a local decision. All gravel pits create noise impacts, so the Board leaves <br />the decision of land use compatibility related to noise in the hands of the local land use <br />authority. <br />- The potential for ground water and surface water impacts is also occasionally raised as a <br />concem for asphalt batch plants. The Loveland Pit operation will be required to obtain a <br />storm water discharge permit from the Colorado Department of Health and Environment. <br />This permit requires the preparation of a Storm Water Management Plan and typically <br />includes a Spill Prevention, Containment, and Countermeasures Plan. A copy of these <br />plans has been included in the reclamation permit application. <br />No specific concerns have been provided, and the objector did not participate in the Informal <br />Conference held on July 20, 2000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.