My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47663
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47663
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:41 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:15:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/16/2006
Doc Name
Pit Backfill Stability Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 20 Attachment 20-A
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Manb 2006 Prt Naekfi/l ,SJabilrty * 11 U%' ~ PuEe 1 <br />• INTRODUCTION <br />Seneca Coal Company is currently backfilling the pits at the IIW Mine with spoils removed from the <br />pits during mining operations. Generally, Seneca plans to place these spoils at slopes up to 2.SH:1 V, <br />in order to match the pre-mining aspect of the terrain. <br />Seneca contracted MWH m catty out field and laboratory testing on the spoils material at the IIW <br />Mine and perform a stability analysis to check the suitability of the 2.SH:1V grading plan for post <br />mining reclamation slopes. <br />FIELD TESTING <br />In-sicu moisture and density tests were performed on the spoils piles at the IIW mine, on February 1, <br />2005, using a nuclear density gauge. Twenty-two moisture-density tests were performed at the Wolf <br />Creek, Sage Creek, North Wadge, and South Wadge pits. The locations of the tests performed are <br />shown on Figvre 1, Moisture-Density 1~est Locations. The in-situ moisture content of the spoils ranged <br />from 71.7% to 22.G%. The in-situ density of the spoils ranged from 91.5 pcf to 112.0 pcf. The mean <br />values of the in-situ moisture content and dry density were 15.7% and 103.1 pcf respectively. In <br />additioq bulk spoIls material samples were taken From the area directly underneath the nuclear density <br />gauge at eight of the test locations. Each bulk sample consisted of approximately 5 gallons of soil <br />taken from the site of a density test. Table 1, IIW Mine .Spoilr Field Testing Results and Corrected Results <br />shows the moisture-density testing performed and the bulk samples collected. <br />LABORATORY TESTING <br />• Six of the bulk samples from the field program were sent to Northwest Colorado Consultants, Inc. <br />for index testing, that included the following tests: Natural Moisture Content, Grain Size Analysis, and <br />Atterberg Limits. The results of the index testing are summarized in Table 2, IIW Mme Spoils Index <br />Testing Summary. The test results are shown in full in Appendix A, Laboratory Test Results. <br />Based on the index testing results, the natural moisture contents were used to calculate a corrected <br />field moisture content. The corrected moisture contents were then used [o correct the moisture and <br />density readings generated with the nuclear density gauge. The corrected field moisture and density <br />tests are shown in Table 1, IIiY/Mine Spoils Field Tenting Rerultr and Corrected Results. The mean values of <br />the corrected moisture content and dry density were 12.2% and 106.3 pcE respectively. <br />Bulk sample IIW-1 was selected for triaxial testing because it has the highest Plasticity Index (PI) and <br />Liquid Limit (LL), as shown in Figure 2, Plasticity Chart for Samples from IIW Mine, and a high <br />percentage of fines (material < #200 sieve). This sample was sent to Golder Associates, Inc. Eor a <br />three stage Consolidated Undrained Triaxial test. The sample material was remolded to a target dry <br />density and moisture content similar to the corrected average from the field testing. A dry density of <br />105.5 pcf at a moisture content of 12.8% was achieved, which is representative of the corrected field <br />densities and moistures. The results of this test are shown in Appendix A, Laboratory Tert Results. Two <br />tests performed during the February 1, 2005 field visit showed low dry densities (Test #4 and Test <br />#19). The uncorrected densities of these tests were 91.5 pcf and 95.8 pcf. The Erst test was <br />performed in freshly spread spoils which had not been compacred by placement equipment or had <br />time to consolidate. The second test was performed in the Sage Creek Pit spoils pile, which was very <br />muddy overall and specifically in an area that was Freshly disturbed. These two tests are not <br />representative of the material that will exist in the final backfilled slopes of the reclaimed pits, <br />therefore a density value close to the overall corrected average was targeted for the tdaxial testing. <br />• With a representative density value and high plasticity this material represents an appropriately <br />conservative strength value for the material used to backfill the reclaimed pits. <br />Al1Y/H * iJ75 Prne Grove Rand, .Sane 109 * Steamboat SpnaKr, CO 80J87 <br />u' uvlf..xd 11°`lN~hvkld/d~+bMl~lu',v,..v,.. <br />nmmr •n <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.