My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47474
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47474
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:29 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:10:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/2/2006
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 74 Monument Dam -Minnesota Reservoir Structure Inventory
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GUNSUL'1'AlV 1'J llVU <br />Tfie structure can pass a flood 'resulting from an event equivalent to <br />40 percent of the "Hydro-I~eteoroloyical Report No. 49" Probably t+,aximuri <br />Thunderstorm witi~out overtoppiny the embankment. <br />It is recommended that a detailed study be performed evaluating the <br />options for increasing the spillway capacity such as raising the darts and/or <br />widening the spillway. However, it is our judgement, based upon the con- <br />dition and history of the dam, that the best approach would be to regrade <br />the crest to a consistent elevation and widen the spillway sufficient]y to <br />enable the dam and reservoir to handle the PMGS and PMTS storm runoff <br />without overtopping the dam embankment. <br />8. STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECNNICAL EVALUATION. <br />a. General. The evaluation of structural stability for Monument <br />Dam is based on discussions with Mr. Simineo and the visual inspection. <br />b. Embankment. The sloughs along the downstream face are judged to <br />be indicative of adverse embankment conditions. Tlie association of seepage <br />with the: sloughing is indicative of a higher than desirab]e phreatic sur- <br />face through tl~e dam at that point. The dam does not appear to suffer unu- <br />sual quantity of seepage. <br />Apparently, no stability analyses were performed in connection with or <br />subsequent to original design. If stability analyses were to be performed, <br />based on existing conditions in fire embankment and foundation, it is <br />believed unlikely that the resulting factors of safety would be comparable <br />to the requirements of paragraph 4.4 of the "Recommended Guidelines for the <br />Safety Inspection of Darns" (Reference 3). The sloughs along the dovrnstream <br />• face are believed to be a clear indication of toss of strength 6y <br />saturation. It is concluded that the existing factor of safety against a <br />deeper seated failure of the dovrnstream face with steady state seepage is <br />unacceptab]y low. <br />9. ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. <br />a. General. In order for Monument Dam and Reservoir to be main- <br />tained in good structural and operating condition, the following steps <br />should be, taken to improve its structural integrity. <br />b. Embankment. <br />{I) The sloughs and surface slides alony the dovrnstream face <br />sfiould be repaired and their locations marked to permit observation during <br />future inspections. <br />(2) The dam should be surveyed and accurate sketches prepared <br />shovring all major features and locating the existing sloughs. <br />face. <br />(3) Piezometers should be installed to monitor the phreatic sur- <br /> <br />-~- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.