My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47451
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:10:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 51 Lower Refuse Pile
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mountain Coal Company, L.L.C. Exhibit 51 <br />West Elk Mine ~ Lower Refuse Pile <br />To estimate residence time within the pile, groundwater movement was analyzed utilizing partially <br />• saturated flow conditions. Using the permeability value of 1.2 x I OJ cm/s and assuming that the material is <br />homogeneous and isotropic, the maximum time for deep percolating groundwater infiltrating from the <br />surface to the base of the pile and begin to mound would be less than 30 days (duration of Stage l flow <br />using McWhorter-Nelson procedure). Regardingresidence time, the conserva[iveapproach is to assume the <br />colluvium/refuse interface represents an impermeable boundary (which may not be true as seepage could <br />likely pass through the interface and into the colluvium). Under this assumptiort a shallow mound will form <br />and grow until drain outflow equals the infiltration inflow. Using the procedures recommended by Glover <br />to analyze the development of the mound, an estimated ~.4 to 5.0 years will be required for the mound to <br />reach its full height. However. during the development stage, the volume within the mound is estimated [o <br />turn over in less than one vear, so the total residence time is estimated to be less than eleven months. The <br />vertical and horizontal permeabilities are likely to not be equal. Thus assuming that the vertical <br />permeability is one order of magnitude less, the vertical residence time (duration of State I) will increase to <br />approximatelyone year. If the horizontal permeability remains the same, the motind development and rate <br />of drainage laterally wil I not be affected. Total residence time in this case would increase to 1.8 years. <br />If the worse case is considered and the permeability of the refuse material is an order of magnitude less in <br />both the vertical and horizontal direction. then the mound development would be significantly affected. In <br />this case it would take approximately 3.1 to 3.4 years for the mound to develop to its full height and for. <br />outflow to equal inflow. Due to the reduced permeabilities. the amount of time required to turn over the <br />volume within the mound would increase to approxima[e1y4.3 years. Vertical residence time (duration of <br />State 1) remains at approximately one year. therefore, the total residence time for this condition would be <br />approximately 5.3 years. This is considered to be a conservative value and not likely to be realistic, <br />particularlywhen the additional infiltration that will occur through [he interface be[weer. the refuse pile and <br />• the colluvium is not considered in this analysis. <br />Table 5 - Results of In-Situ Falling Head Permeability <br />Soil Boring Number Average K (centimeters/second) <br />5 7.8 x 10-s <br />4 2.4 x ] 0' <br />8 5.5 x 10's (Test I ) <br />9 3.6x 10.s <br />5.x.2 Leachate Data <br />5.x.2.1 Leachate Estimate Performed for Phases i through IV <br />Leachate volume is a function of the amount of infiltration into the pile. An estimate of this volume can be <br />produced by applying the mean annual precipitation minus the volume lost to runoff and the volume lost to <br />evaporation. Althoueh runoff is significant in a large storm event, the small precipitation events which <br />compromise the majorih• of mean monthly precipitation produce little or no runoff. A conservative <br />estimate would be that 9~% of the mean annual precipitation enters the soil profile through infiltration. <br />However. only a portion of this volume will be ultimately retained through deep percolation because water <br />• is lost through evaporationand transpiration. A mean annual precipita[ionvalue of 14 incheshas been used. <br />Transpiration effects have been neelected in order to provide conservative data. Evaporation has been <br />l4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.