My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47424
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:09:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/6/2004
Doc Name
Geotechnical Design & Operational Considerations for Highwall Mining, IIW & Yoast Areas
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 12 Attachment 12-3 Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • <br />At the request of Mr. John Rusnak, Director Geology, Peabody Energy, NSA <br />Engineering, Inc., performed evaluations of the geotechnical design requirements and <br />related operational considerations for hiQhwal] mining at the Seneca Mine near Hayden, <br />CO. Highwall mining with a Peabody Energy-owned Superior Highwall Miner (PM) <br />will be conducted, with potential penetration up to 1,000 ft into the highwall. Two <br />different azeas were analyzed: the Seneca IIW Area, and the Yoast Area. Within the <br />Seneca IIW area, three seams will be targeted. From the lowest elevation upward, they <br />aze the Wolf Creek, Sage Creek, and \\~adge Seams. In the Yoast area, only the Wolf <br />Creek and Wadge Seams are tazgeted. <br />This report addresses the followine specific issues relative to highwall mining <br />with the Superior Highwall Miner (SHM) at the Seneca Mine: y <br />• What specific geotechnicaVgeological constraints exist within the identified coal <br />seams and mining areas that may limit highwall mining applications? <br />• For each seam to be mined, what minimum web pillar dimension (as a function <br />of depth, mining height, and material properties) will ensure that highwall <br />stability is unaffected by mining operations? <br />• What is the potential for "cascading pillar failure," and if required, "'hat • <br />minimum dimension of barrier pillar will be required to sufficiently isolate <br />extraction panels within and bet.yeen major mining regions along the existing <br />highwall? <br />• For each coal seam, what is the potential for out-of-seam dilution of the mined <br />product, taking into account roof stability for 11.5-ft•~+ide rectangular openings <br />and anticipated roof/floor conditions? <br />• \~Vhere the \i'olf Creek and Sage Creek Seams are mined in close proximity, to <br />what degree will seam interaction dictate special operational or design <br />considerations? <br />• \\'hat operational measures can be taken to increase high~~ all mining efficiency <br />and safety? <br />To best address these questions, 1~'SA's evaluation ~a~as conducted by completing <br />three Tasks. including (1) site characterization (review of site conditions and current <br />highwall stability, core recovered from the Yoast Area, physical properly testing, etc.): <br />(2) engineering design (empirical and numerical modeling evaluation of optima] mining <br />plans for the Seneca IIW and Yoast Areas); and (3) operational considerations <br />(identification of relative risks to mining by pit, production efficiency. potential for out- <br />of-seam product dilution etc.). • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.