Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />2.05 APPLICATIOd4 FOR PERMIT FOR SURb7,L'E OR tAIDE[~GROZJtd) MINING ACPIVITIES - <br />MINIAlIII~i REQUIRII~lfS FOR OPERATION AMID RECLAMATION PI.AUiS. <br />2.05.6 Mitigation of bvrface Coal Mining Operation Eaq~acts. (COnt'd.) <br />(6) (f) (i) (B) (Cont'd.) <br />subsidence or abandoned mine subsid <br />visual monitoring will enable CWI to <br />described in the Subsidence repair <br />necessary <br />(6) (f) (ii) <br />ence would not occur. Continued <br />implement repair procedures <br />Handbook (Volume 3), where <br />During this initial permit term, mining is not projected beneath any <br />Renewable Resource Lands, identified structures, or other features such <br />as pipelines, powerlines, and roads. If during subsequent subsidence <br />monitoring, the subsidence effects differ greatly frwn the predicted <br />effects, the following subsidence control plan will be modified to <br />ensure damage or diminution of the foreseeable use would not ocarr. <br />J <br />The subsidence study performed by Geo-Hydro Consulting, Inc. aryl <br />presented in the Subsidence Appendix, Volume 3, determined that <br />material damage or diminution of the foreseeable use of the permit area <br />would not occur. Near surface, colluvial/alluvial deposits are present <br />within Stevens (filch and East Roatcap Creek and constitute Renewable <br />Resource Lands. See Map No. 9-1. The following subsidence control <br />plan is proposed during subsequent permit terms. <br />Federal lease C-377210 stipulation "g" limits extraction beneath <br />Steven's Gulch and East Roatcap Creek to necessary development access <br />entryways below 600 feet of overburden thickness. In ccmq~liance with <br />BLM stipulation "g", CbV will drive access entryways only beneath the <br />Stevens Gulch aril East Roatcap Creek drainage buffer zones under 600 <br />feet of overburden. Permanent protective pillars will be left standing <br />to prevent all surface and subjacent disturbance to the overburden. <br />Protective pillars in these buffer zones will be designed to provide <br />safety factors in excess of 2.0 using the Wilson pillar design method <br />(refer to Pillar Stability Calculations in Volume 2). Panel designs <br />for specific development geometries and mining heights vary within <br />these buffer zones and are optimized to provide maxim~nn economic <br />recovery of the coal resource, however, the minimum safety factor <br />criteria for all panels developed within these buffer zones remains <br />constant at 2.0. Secondary extraction or retreat mining is limited to <br />the recovery of floor coal within previously developed entries. All <br />development entries are roof bolted in accoxclance with the approved <br />roof control plan in effect. <br />• <br />TR 92-19 Revised 6/08/92 <br />156 <br />