My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47342
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:23 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:07:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/21/2005
Doc Name
Exhibits 125-126
From
City of Black Hawk
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
respond. <br />Drainage Designs -The applicant indicates on page 8 that a drainage diversion will be placed as shown <br />on Exhibit C2-B to divert water around this site and back to the original drainage course; and that surface <br />water from disturbed areas will be diverted on the south to a settling basin prior to being released back into <br />the natural drainage system. The applicant further indicates on page 13 that several drainages will be <br />recreated during the grading process to drain water from the affected azea. Review of Exhibits CZ-B & <br />C2-C indicates that diverted waters from undisturbed areas will be merged with heated waters from <br />affected lands prior to being discharged offsite towazd North Cleaz Creek; that there is no definitive <br />treatment system for stormwater passing over the quarry area; and that there is insufficient information to <br />verify that all waters dischazged offsite will be dischazged safely in a controlled manner so as to m;nim;ze <br />the potential for otfsite erosion Further, there is no supporting watershed information and/or hydraulic <br />computations to verify the adequate sizing of sediment pond structures, culverts, or drainage channels <br />treating or conveying runoff waters from the contributing watershed. (In most cases, it is desirable that <br />runoff waters from upland, undisturbed areas be diverted around the affected lands and not merged with <br />heated or process waters from the affected land. Further, Best Management Practices should be employed <br />in treating stormwater runoff passing over affected lands prior to release downstream andlor offsite). <br />Please address. <br />Drainage Design Inputs -Consideration should be given to the size and capacity of natural drainage <br />features in the design of shttctures used to convey runoff waters from an undisturbed, contributing <br />watershed. Stroctures used to treat ar convey runoff waters from a disturbed, affected azea will need to be <br />sized to handle the peak velocity and volume from a design storm event in a controlled utanner. Permanent <br />structures to be left in place during final reclamation will need to be designed based on a 100-year storm <br />event Temporary structures to be removed during final reclamation will need to be designed based on a <br />10-yeaz, 24-hour storm event, or a 2-yeaz, 6 hour storm event, whichever is greater. Please address. <br />Blasting Plan -Allen Sorenson of the Division will provide review comments regazding the applicant's <br />proposed blasting plan and documentation of blasting procedures, per Rute 6.4.4(i). Mr. Sorenson's <br />comments will be forwazded to the applicant as soon as they become available. <br />Uranium Mineralization - A number of objectors have expressed concert over potential impacts from <br />uranium that maybe exposed via drilling and blasting at the MMRR Quarry. Such impacts may result <br />from uranium from airborne dust or stormwater runoff. The Division requests that the applicant address <br />'the poti5ntial~foF adveisi53fiipacts to fiuman Fiealfb,-andtfie env7ronmenT indludingvegetatibn, m7d]ife, and <br />surface water quality of North Clear Creek. The Division requests that the applicant address the potential <br />for mineralization of uranium by implementing one of the following options: <br />Option I -Detailed Geologic Assessment : Prior to drilling and blasting as specified in the mine plan, <br />the applicant will submit for Division review and approval a detailed geologic assessment of the presence, <br />extent, and concentration of uranium within the affected land to be removed and/or exposed during mining <br />activities. Such assessment should assess the toxicology of uranium to the human and envirottmental <br />receptors, identifying in particular the level above which uranium and radiation regulations would require <br />dust control, and/or the l evel above which water quality regulations would require dust control to minimize <br />impacts to surface water quality. If needed, the assessment should propose uranium monitoring, and a <br />containment and control plan to be employed during mining and reclamation. Such monitoring, <br />containment, and control should include mitigation measures to minimize potential impacts to human <br />health and the environment, and containment and control measures to ensure compliance with all <br />applicable Federal, State, and local regulations for dust emissions and surface water contamination. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.