My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47326
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:22 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:06:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 07 Appendices 7-2 and 7-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• the UTL well is well beyond the expected range for a sandstone and is likely due to fracturing of <br />the Rollins Sandstone. Regional fracturing has been reported in this portion of the Piceance Basin <br />(Collins, 1996). The fracturing appears to extend to the outcrop of the Rollins at the Colorado <br />River. As a result water from the Colorado River and the associated alluvium is likely transmitted <br />along the localized fracturing to the extent of the UTL well. Based upon the volume of water <br />encountered within the UTL well and the reported inflows into the Roadside North Mine, it would <br />appear that the fracturing is discontinuous and does not fully extend to the mine. <br />Well potential for domestic purposes based upon transmissivities encountered in the N-Decline and <br />the RSS wells is characterized as poor. However, well potential based upon the transmissivity of <br />the UTL well would be greater. However, well potential for the UTL well is based solely on the <br />available water as influenced by the Colorado River. <br />The Rollins Sandstone cannot be considered an aquifer based upon the results of aquifer testing <br />of the RSS well and the N-Decline well. Insufficient quantities of water are produced for beneficial <br />use in these two locations. Additionally, even though aquifer testing of the RSN well was not <br />possible, during groundwater sampling slow recharge was noted suggestive of similar <br />transmissivities to that of the RSS and N-Decline wells. The water encountered in the UTL well <br />is anomalous and is influenced by localized fracturing and subsequent influence from the Colorado <br />River. <br />• <br /> Table 2 <br /> Aquifer Characteristics <br /> Hydraulic <br /> Transmissivity Conductivity Potential <br /> (T) (K) Pumping Rate <br />Well ID gal/day/ft ft/day gal/min Aquifer Potential <br />N-Decline Well 9.7 0.014 0.62 Insufficient quantity and quality of <br /> water for beneficial use <br />RSS Well 36.9 0.052 2.33 Insufficient quantity and quality of <br /> water for beneficial use <br />RSN Well NA NA NA Insufficient quantity and quality of <br /> water for beneficial use <br />UTL Well 1,504 2.12 95 Insufficient quality of water <br />Slug-In <br />UTL Well 3084 4.34 195 Insufficient quality of water <br />Slu¢-out <br />NA =Well artesian and no[ tested <br />• <br />r2.591U\Sepmmber l6. 1997 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.