Laserfiche WebLink
Section 779.22 (a) Continued. <br />• Permit Area) would be conversion of some minor acreages of current <br />rangeland to pastureland by removing the brush. The conversion of <br />rangeland to pastureland or of pastureland to cropland would also <br />be feasible prior to mining. Such changes are unlikely however as <br />current trends on lands adjacent to the proposed permit area are <br />for cropland to be converted to pasturelands. <br />Premining Productivity <br />Productivity of the rangeland and pastureland areas on the proposed <br />permit area in terms of forage production, ground cover and carrying <br />capacities as obtained from Range Site Descriptions prepared by the <br />USDA - Soil Conservation Service for the proposed permit area are <br />found in Table 42, Forage Production, Percent Vegetative Cover and <br />Carrying Capacity By Range Site. As can be observed from Table 42, <br />Forage Production, Percent Vegetative Cover and Carrying Capacity <br />• By Range Site, annual forage production in teens of pounds of air <br />dry forage per acre during normal precipitation years averages 1411 <br />lbs/A across the permit area with a range depending on site from <br />400 to 2000 pounds per acre. Animal carrying capacity during <br />normal years averages 1.41 animal months per acre with a range of <br />0.5 to 3.0 animal unit months on grazing per acre. Site specific <br />data on pasturelands in terms of productivity and carrying rapa- <br />cities are similar to those reported for the native range site <br />descriptions. According to the information contained in Table 81, <br />Land Use Capabilities and Cropland Potentials Within the Proposed <br />Energy Fuels Corporation Permit Area, pasture yields under in- <br />tensive management are reported b}• the Soil Conservation Service to <br />range between 1.5 to 2.0 tons of dry matter per acre. Site spe- <br />cific forage production figures for the proposed permit area can be <br />found in Section 779.19. <br />Wood products have never been a historic use of the aspen and oak <br />• trees found within the proposed permit area. Aside from a very <br />779-312 <br />