My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE47013
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE47013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:05 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 1:00:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006073
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/4/2007
Doc Name
Adequacy Response 2
From
Banks and Gesso, LLC
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Alex Schatz <br />March 3Q 2007 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />The alluvium in Fountain Valley consists of gravels and sand containing minor amounts <br />of silt and clay, ranges in thickness from a few feet up to 100 feet thick, and is underlain by the <br />relatively impermeable Pierre Shale. Mesa gravel can be found along the side of the Fountain <br />Creek valley. The mesa gravel is interbedded with numerous sandy layers and ranges in <br />thickness but averages about 10 feet thick. <br />Hydrogeologic data specific to the Fountain Valley alluvium were available in Water- <br />Supply Paper 1583 (Jenkins, 1964), and typical hydrogeologic data for sands and gravels have <br />also been published. Values for hydraulic conductivity range from 100 to 10,000 feet per day. <br />Values of specific yield range from 18.6 to 35.3 percent (Jenkins, 1964). Water levels reported <br />in nearby wells and in site boring logs indicate the water level varies from a few feet below the <br />ground surface to 28 feet below ground surface. <br />MODFLOW MODEL <br />To allow for estimation of the potential impact on the local water table in response to <br />dewatering of the pits, a numerical ground water flow model was constructed. The mode] code <br />utilized was the United States Geological Survey "MODFLOW" model ("Modular Finite <br />Difference Ground Water Flow Model"). The proprietary pre- and post-processing software, <br />Groundwater Modeling System ("GMS"), was used to develop the model files, to assist in model <br />grid layout, and to graphically present the water table and drawdown configurations following <br />each run. MODFLOW and GMS are both widely used and accepted modeling software <br />packages that have become standards in the industry. <br />Discretization <br />The model domain was rotated 22 degree clockwise in order to better align the model <br />grid and the proposed mining cells. The model was then bounded by constant head cells on the <br />top and bottom edges of the model domain. The model was bounded on the left side by a <br />combination of no flow cells and constant head cells approximately 1.4 miles from the edge of <br />the proposed gravel pits and bounded on the right side by no flow cells and constant head cells <br />approximately 0.7 miles from the edge of the proposed gravel pits. The model cells were sized <br />to be approximate 100-foot squares. The model domain is presented in Figure 2. <br />The model was created as a one-layer model representing the alluvial layer in which the <br />gravel pits will be mined. The depth of the alluvium was determined from site boring logs <br />provided by Lafarge, data from the State Engineer's well database, and ground surface elevations <br />at each boring or well location. The elevations of the bottom of the alluvium were then <br />contoured using the Kriging method to develop the topography of the base of the alluvium. <br />S:\536 -Banks and Gesso, LLC~536.4 - Sundance Pit\Report\Final Letter Report.doc <br />Martin and Wood Water Consultants, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.