My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE46933
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE46933
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:49:01 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:58:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/2004
Doc Name
Adequacy Comment Responses to Divisions Letter of 7/6/04
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Permit Revision Adequacy Comment Response <br />November 3Q 2004 <br />Page 14 of 24 <br />•75. Please describe the significance of the "angle of major influence" as defined on page 2.05-114 <br />and section 5.6 of Exhibit 60B and relate how that applies to the SOD situation at the West Elk <br />Mine. <br />MCC Response: The significance is that it was used in the computer modeling. Text <br />updated. <br />76. On page 2.05-117, the first two number statements, please reiterate the predicted values for <br />clarity in the text. <br />MCC Response: Revised text. <br />77. On page 2.05-119, in the section titled "Potential Impact of Water..." does MCC have any <br />estimate of the probability of water effecting vertical displacements in the SOD based on <br />drilling or other observations? <br />MCC Response: Revised text. <br />78. The compilation of locations of steep slopes with potential for rockfalls on page 2.05-120 is <br />informative, but the Division requests that MCC provide a map showing these azeas in relation <br />to proposed panel layout. Areas of greatest crack formation aze predicted above barrier pillazs, <br />for example, so the DMG believes that an evaluation of locations where the barrier pillars may <br />occur beneath cliff faces and other potentially sensitive features is necessary for prediction of <br />areas susceptible to rockfall. <br />MCC Response: MCC completed a baseline report and map included as Exhibit 60D. <br />79. The Division requests that MCC collect baseline information in the areas of low to moderate <br />rockfall potential, as noted on page 2.05-121, pazagraph 5. <br />MCC Response: Same as No 78 above. <br />80. Under the heading "Possible Subsidence Consequences," number 1 predicts that no cracks will <br />occur in the alluvium of Dry Fork or Lick Creek, implying the unconsolidated deposits there <br />are greater than 10 feet thick. Please provide a reference to the observed thickness of the <br />alluvium in these azeas. <br />MCC Response: New Exhibits 60B, 60D, and text in 2.05.6 was updated. <br />81. On page 2.05-124, 2"d paragraph, does the author mean "Deep Creek" or Dry Fork? <br />MCC Response: MCC made the change to Dry Fork. <br />~82. On page 2.05-126, 2"d pazagraph, the statement occurs "panels E through E9." Please add the <br />panel number where appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.