Laserfiche WebLink
and 5t~iF2427 from devastating soil sliding and slumping. The impairments <br />to the physical integrity of these sites have occurred to such an extent <br />that they are no longer viable locations for historical archaeological <br />data retrieval. In addition the structural remains at 5MF2427 Have been <br />damaged and cannot foreseeably be protected from further destruction from <br />the forces of nature. <br />The prehistoric component of site 5hiF950 has been substantially <br />damaged by road construction through the site prior to the establishment <br />of the Trapper htirie. Based on what was observed during site recording, <br />it is estimated that up to 90% of the prehistoric component has been <br />disturbed. In addition, no temporally diagnostic artifacts were observed <br />nor were cultural features or indications of subsurface deposits de- <br />tected. As a result, it appears very unlikely that the site contains <br />material likely to yield information important to the prehistory of the <br />region. <br />It is apparent from the foregoing discussion that sites 5t•iF950 and <br />5t•1F24L7 have suffered disturbances which have adversely impaired their <br />integrity as archaeological and architectural entities. As a result it <br />is recommended that neither site be considered eligible for inclusion in <br />the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, it is suggested <br />that the recordation conducted by Nickens and Associates at these two <br />locations be considered adequate mitigation of the impacts expected to <br />take place when the respective site areas are mined for coal. <br />• Nianayement Considerations <br />In Fiay of 1987, site 5hiF95U was rerecorded and site 5hIF2427 recorded <br />for the first time by Nickens and Associates. Neither site is recom- <br />mended as eligible for inclusion in the National Register of tlistoric <br />Places. This evaluation of site significance is a recommendation only <br />and requires a final determination of site significance by the Colorado <br />State Historic Preservation Office. To obtain such a determination, a <br />copy of this report including the state site forms comprising Appendix A <br />must be fo rvrarded to the SHPO. If the SHPO concurs with the recommenda- <br />tion that sites 5MF950 and 5t4F2427 be considered insignificant cultural <br />resources, it is unlikely that Trapper Mining, Inc. will be required to <br />conduct additional historical or archaeological work at the site. <br />References <br />Buckles, William G. and Nancy B. Buckles <br />1984 Colorado Historical Archaeology Context. Colorado Historical <br />Society, Denver. <br />Grady, James <br />1984 Northwest Colorado Prehistoric Context. Office of Archaeology <br />and Historic Preservation, Denver. <br />Husband, Piichael B. <br />1484 Plaieau Country Historic Context. Office of Archaeology and <br />Historic Preservation, State tlistoric Preservation Office, <br />Denver. <br />