My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE46725
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE46725
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:48:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:54:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981148
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/26/1983
Doc Name
REGULAR 112 PERMIT APPLICATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' EXHIBIT J (Cont'd) <br />The shrub areas are dominated by Rhos trilobata, on the one hand, and <br />' Cercocarpus montanus, on the other. There is very little overlap between <br />the individual stands of each species and therefore seem to indicate a response <br />' to some environmental gradient that expresses very different tolerances in each <br />species. <br />Throughout the foothill region Rhus is almost invariably found on lower <br />' slopes than Cercoca^pvs. It is the same pattern here with Rhos lower on the <br />slope but adjoining the Cercocarous stands. The cause of this pattern is not <br />' xe11 understood. It certainly is related to an environmental gradient and not a <br />chemical antagonism between species. Understory species differ very little and <br />' therefore, on the whole, they do not represent very distinctive communities <br />although they look quite different visually. <br />' Overall cover approaches 100°G. Soils are generally dry, hot, coarse, full <br />of rocks, an~i quite thin. <br />' Drainage Courses- <br />Although most of the land is relatively undissected by drainage courses, <br />' several small ones and one large one exists. Within these courses is found a <br />wide variety of vegetation stand types. Some are closely related to surrounding <br />' areas already described while others are linked, ecologically, to the Bear Creek <br />stream channel vegetation a couple of miles south of the affected lands. Probably, <br />the best way to describe the Ea~inage Course vegetation would be to follow a more or <br />' less typical course to its ultimate development on the site. <br />The vegetation of the upper parts of the drainage courses are hardly distinguishable <br />' from the Valley Plain vegetation that merges xith the drainage courses. Generally, <br />the vegetation is a Stipa-A~ropyron dominated type on moderately heavy to heavy <br />' soils with or without a gravelly surface. <br />As the course becomes more definite with eroded soils on the sides, the <br />grassland becomes broken but remains where the land has any stability. Where less <br />' stability is found a dense growth of small individuals of Rosa can develop on side <br />slopes and occassionally on the bottom of the course as xell. Until the course <br />' becomes quite deep, the vegetation varies between a graspdominated form and <br />a Rosa-dominated form. <br />When the course becomes quite deep the vegetation takes on a remarkable <br />diversity. Bare, eroded slopes become mixed with densely vegetated areas. The <br />' vegetated areas vary from grass slopes to shrub-covered slopes of Viburnum, Rhus, <br />Svmnhoriocarpos, and Cercocarous. In the bottoms where moisture is abundant <br />willows and Cottonxoods are often common and can become quite large. <br />' Vegetation cover varies from 0% to 100%. Soils are either deep, gravelly and <br />moist, or are a heavy clay, or a dry, stony sandy loam. <br />' 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.