My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE46723
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE46723
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:48:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:54:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/8/1988
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX Q ADEQUACY REVIEW QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 Exhibit E, Section E.3.1.2 revised to include a discussion of the rock toe <br />buttress and the impermeable barrier 2/15/89 and further revised 4/20/89. <br />Section D.3 Waste Rock Disposal <br />Section D.3.1 Genera) <br />' 6. Does cross section A-A', illustrated in Figure D.3-4, refer to a <br />specific figure, or is this an idealized cross section? <br />Response: Cross section A-A' refers to figure D.3-2. A cross section <br />location has been added to Figure D.3-2. <br />Figure D.3-2 revised 2/15/89. <br />Section D.3.3.2 Waste Rock Geochemistry <br />7. Pease specify the Location and depth of each waste rock sample taken. <br />This information will help us to make a determination as to the sample <br />significance. <br />Response: The drilling logs for each sample are enclosed along with a <br />notation on each log for the approximate interval from which a <br />composite sample was taken. The drill logs include a coordinate <br />location for each hole. <br />BMR geologists selected the core based on criteria established <br />t by SRK's geochemical expert. The criteria included selecting a <br />sample that was considered representative of the general rock <br />type being tested, selecting a sample that might represent a <br />worst case for the rock type being tested, and ensuring that a <br />sufficient amount of material was available in the core selected <br />to complete the testing. BMR geologists first reviewed the drill <br />logs for drill holes which had been cored. They then selected <br />potential drill holes with logs which matched the criteria. The <br />core from the selected holes was examined to verify the logs. <br />Once BMR geologists had determined that the core matched the <br />' criteria, the core was shipped to SRK`s laboratory for <br />development of a composite sample. <br />' Exhibit D, Section D.3.3.2 revised to include this information 4/20/89. <br />8. To characterize the estimated 32 million tons of waste rock expected <br />to be generated from the open pit areas, eight waste rock samples <br />analyses were submitted for review. Please describe how this sample set <br />adequately characterizes site conditions, given the amount and variety <br />of waste rock to be generated on site. <br />' Response: BMR believes that the sample set adequately characterizes site <br />conditions. <br />' Based on the revised pit design presented on Figures C-3 and C- <br />4 approximately 22.5 million tons of waste rock is expected to <br />be generated at the San Luis Project. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.