My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE46723
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE46723
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:48:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:54:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/8/1988
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX Q ADEQUACY REVIEW QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />conclusion for the pond embankment stability analysis. <br />1 Response: Construction specifications for the solution ponds are equivalent <br />to the heap leach facilities. Berm construction specifications <br />were intended to include pond embankment berms and heap leach <br />perimeter berms. Liner placement and secondary recovery layer <br />placement construction specifications were also intended to <br />include both the pad and ponds. Appendix N has been revised to <br />clarify this issue. <br />Regarding slope stability documentation, it has been the industry <br />standard to construct pond berms with 3H:1V internal side slopes <br />and 2H:1V external side slopes. This geometry is readily accepted <br />in every state as a stable structure. Cases requiring further <br />attention and perhaps subsequent modification generally include <br />ponds constructed in exceptionally weak foundations or using weak <br />construction materials and ponds constructed on steep natural <br />terrain. <br />The design engineer for the project, SRK, does have on file <br />stability calculations for ponds constructed under the above <br />exceptions which are similar in configuration to the ponds <br />proposed for the San Luis Project and which have been <br />demonstrated to be stable. <br />Pond stability analyses submitted in letter dated 2/22/89. Section D.7.6 <br />' added to Exhibit D to incorporate this information into the permit <br />application 4/20/89. <br />42. Pease specify pond sediment accumulation monitoring, maintenance and <br />disposal measures. <br />Response: No significant sediment accumulation is anticipated based on the <br />San Luis ore characteristics as a sandy ore. BMR will lower the <br />ponds annually for a visual examination of sedir~~ent levels. If <br />sediment levels are in excess of 2.5 feet, there~y eliminating <br />one foot of the provided two feet of freeboard, EMR will remove <br />the pond sediment and dispose of the sediment on inactive areas <br />of the leach pad. <br />I Exhibit D, Section D.7.4.2 revised to include this information 4/20/89. <br />Section 0.7.4.3 Leak Detection System <br />t 43. Please specify the leak detection monitoring schedule, reryorting <br />procedures, and mitigation methods to be employed, should solution be <br />detected. <br />Response: 8MR will monitor the secondary recovery/leak detection systems <br />once each day during the initial month of start up for each <br />phase. After the initial month, the secondary recoveryjleak <br />detection system will be monitored weekly. Results will be <br />reported and mitigation employed in accordance with the following <br />schedule. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.