Laserfiche WebLink
<br />`J <br /> v <br />• -2 • <br /> Estimated 1 °l, in potential <br />Common IJame Scientific I4ame~~ composition by plant <br />Forbs contd. Genus Species air dried weight community <br />Red root pigweed Amaranthus retroflexus 1 <br />Tiouse-ear-chickweed Cerastium vulgatum T , <br />Kochia Kochia scoparia 30 <br />Dandelion Taxaxacum officinalis T <br />Giant ragweed Ambrosia trifida 1 <br />Spiny coclcleburr Xanthium spinosum 1 <br />Pennsylvania smartweed Polygonum pennsylvanic um T <br />Common sunflower Helianthus annuus T <br />Gum weed Grindelia squarrosa T <br />Purslane Portulaca oleracea T <br />IJormwood sage Artemisia drancunculus T <br />Sticktight Lappula echinata T <br />Scarlet globe mellow Sphaeralcea cQccinea T <br />~ <br />Asparagus Asparagus officinalis T <br />Pepperweed Lepidium virginicum T <br />l,'oody Plants <br />Salt cedar Tamarix pentandra T <br />Trees <br />Cottonwood Populas sargentii <br />IJillow Salix amygdaloides <br />TOTALS~IID°r -TG°~ <br />This range site is in poor condition as compared to its potential. 1'he ground <br />cover is about 35% and annual production is about 2,500 pounds per acre air <br />dried weight. <br />I observed 52 cottomrood trees, in various conditions, and several cottomrood <br />saplings. There are 14 willows and several saplings of willo~rs, ~•~hich are in <br />fair condition. <br />The south half of this field is clean of vegetation and gravel is stock piled. <br /> <br /> <br />