Laserfiche WebLink
• 2 • <br /> Estimated % % in potential <br /> Common Name Scientific Name composition by plant <br /> Forbs contd. Genus Species air dried weight community <br />• R <br />d <br />t <br />d <br />i A <br />h <br /> e <br />roo <br />p <br />gwee <br />. marant <br />us retroflexus 1 <br /> Mouse-ear-chickweed Cerastium vulgatum T . <br /> Kochia Kochia scoparia 30 <br /> Dandelion Taxaxacum officinalis T <br /> Giant ragweed Ambrosia trifida 1 <br /> Spiny cocicleburr Xanthium spinosum 1 <br /> Pennsylvania smartweed Polygonum pennsylvanic um T <br /> Common sunflower Helianthus annuus T <br /> Gum weed Grindelia squarrosa T <br /> Purslane Portulaca oleracea T <br /> Idormvrood sage Artemisia drancunculus T <br /> Sticktight Lappula echinata T <br />~ Scarlet globe mellow Sphaeralcea~ coccinea T <br /> Asparagus Asparagus officinalis T <br /> Peppervreed Lepidium virginicum T <br /> Woody Plants <br />• Salt cedar Tamarix pentandra T <br /> Trees <br /> <br /> Cottonwood Populas sargentii <br /> IJillow Salix amygdaloides <br /> TOTALST6b~ <br />This range site is in poor condition as compared to its potential. Tlie ground <br />cover is about 35% and annual production is about 2,500 pounds per acne air <br />dried weight. <br />I observed 52 cottonwood trees, in various conditions, and several cottonwood <br />saplings. There are 14 cuillows and several saplings of willows, whict are in <br />fair condition. <br />The south half of this field is clean of vegetation and gravel is stock piled. <br /> <br />