Laserfiche WebLink
Generally, where headcutting is a concern, identification for <br />a mile upstream only, or to the first structure would be <br />requested. I don't know why downstream features would be <br />requested. Regardless, in this case headcutting, is not a <br />logical concern. <br />A Your plan shows a 100' setback from the south property line, <br />mainly to protect a road that serves other portions of the <br />same property. This setback should be more than sufficient to <br />insure upstream property is not impacted by the operation. If <br />some erosion does occur during the intermittent storm events, <br />the first area to be effected would be the road, which the <br />. owner will of course restore for access to other parts of the <br />property. <br />I hope this letter is sufficient to satisfy the Planning <br />Department. You might also wish to talk with County Engineering <br />Department on their opinion, as I believe they are the more logical <br />• County agency to have a relevant opinion on drainage issues to see <br />if they concur with mp analyses and recommendations. <br />Sin erely, <br />~ William W. Wilson, P.E. <br />• <br /> <br /> r <br /> C <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />