Laserfiche WebLink
tubificid worms and dipteran larvae (e. g., Palpomyia and chironomid larvae). <br />Aquatic insects normally abundant in permanent streams, such as mayflies or <br />caddisflies, were not important at either Station 2 or 3 and stoneflies (Ple- <br />coptera) were not collected. <br />f Invertebrates in pools are usually restricted to a few abundant taxa. <br />Many species are limited by the fact that pools in streams exhibit reduced <br />1 algal production (decreased sunlight), homogeneous silt-covered substrate and <br />the possibility of local oxygen deficits. chironomid larvae and tubificid <br />worms, often abundant in pools, are adapted to this type of habitat. The <br />permanent nature of the beaver ponds at Station 1 resulted in higher densities <br />than the other pool habitats. Chironomids and worms dominated the benthic <br />I density at this station, but amphipods, clams and mayflies were also abundant. <br />An interesting note is the collection of the freshwater sponge, Eunapius <br />fragilis, which is found in a variety of ponds in Colorado with widely varying <br />water quality (Williams 1980). Invertebrate densities in the pools at the <br />1 lower stations were much lower than Station 1, with amphipods and worms most <br />abundant at Station 2 and chironomid larvae at Station 3. <br />Table 1 also presents number of species and species diversity (D) for the <br />stations on the tributary. Number of taxa generally reflected the available <br />habitat. Many species were found in the pool habitat at Station 1 due to the <br />addition of true standing water (Lentic) water forms not usually found in <br />pools of streams. The number of species in riffle areas was greatest at <br />Station 3, which had more riffle habitat available. The use of the Shannon- <br />Weiner diversity index is encouraged by the EPA (Weber 1973) as a measure of <br />the effects of stress on the macroinvertebrate community. Diversity values <br />from riffle areas were similar at Stations 2 and 3 with values typical of this <br />type of stream. Pools are generally a poorer source of species (Hynes 1970) <br />1 and this is reflected in the pools at the lower station on the tributary which <br />have very low diversity index values. The higher diversity value at Station 1 <br />1 reflects the addition of Lentic species as noted above. <br />i Foidel Creek <br />A total of 24 species of benthic invertebrates were collected from Foidel <br />Creek with only two found at all four stations (Table 2). Only Station 4 had <br />i <br />! flowing water and at this station the riffle invertebrates were dominated by <br />Chironomidae Form 1 and the tubificid worm Limnodrilus. Pool invertebrate <br />i <br />-8- <br />I <br />