Laserfiche WebLink
• area was evaluated by comparing sample anal yte concentrations to the mast stringent <br />standards promulgated or recommended by the CDOH and other agencies. Three eetegories of <br />water quality standards have been established based on water usage: 1) domestic drinking; <br />2) irrigation; and 3) livestock. Trace metals sampled et springs during the baseline <br />monitoring period were analyzed using the total recoverable technique. Comparisons of <br />trace metal standards were made using total recoverable metal concentrations analyzed in <br />each spring sample collected. <br />Domestic Drinking Yeter Suitebi Lity. As introduced in the previous section titled "Ground <br />Vater Suitability", Table 7-79 presentc a listing of domestic drinking water standards. <br />The standards were comps red against spring sample anelyte concentrations on a spring site <br />basis. The following trace metals listed on Table 7-79 were compered against total <br />recoverable metal concentratfons analyzed in samples collected at each spring: As, Ba, <br />Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Se, Ag, and 2n. <br />Table 7-27 presents the comparison results in an identical format to Table 7-20 found in <br />the Ground Vater Suitability section of this tab. Table 7-27 shows ell springs monitored <br />• in end adjacent to the Yoest mining area commonly exceed the secondary drinking water <br />standards established for TDS and sulfate. Both Springs YSP G3 and YSPG6 commonly exceed <br />the manganese standard, and Springs YSPG4 and YSPG9 both have exceeded the manganese <br />standard at least once. Also, Spring YSP G3 has shown exceedences of the iron standard. <br />Although the exceedences presented in Table 7-27 involve secondary drinking water <br />standards, the comparisons indicate the monitored springs are unsuitable for domestic <br />drinking water use. <br />Agricultural Voter Suitability. Table 7-21 (previously introduced, see Section "Ground <br />Voter Suitability") presents agricultural (irrigation) standards developed by the Colorado <br />Department of Neelth (CDOX, 1994) end other agencies for ground water. These agricultural <br />standards were compared against sample constituent concentrations measured in each spring <br />monitored. The following trace metals listed for agricultural standards in Table 7-21 <br />were compared against total recoverable metal concentrations analyzed in each spring <br />sample collected: Al, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Mo, Mi, Pb, Se, end Zn. <br />• Table 7-28 presents the comparison results in an identical format to Table 7-27. Table <br />7-ZB shows that the manganese agricultural standard was exceeded et two monitored springs, <br />YSPG3 and YSPG9. Also, both the sulfate and total dissolved solids standards were <br />79 Revised 03/01/95 <br />