Laserfiche WebLink
• were calculated from aquifer tests of nine alluvial wells located on the Sage Creek, <br />Annand Drew, end Grassy Creek drainages (Tables 7.9 and 7-10). A single test at Seneca <br />II-Y yielded a value of 1.4 ft2/day while transmissivity values derived from tests of 7 <br />alluvial wells at Seneca's nearby Seneca II Mine ranged from 7.5 to 439 ft2/day (30.1 <br />2 <br />ft /day geometric mean). Based on these data, it appears that the transmissive rate <br />within the Yoast alluvial system is toward the mid to low end of that determined for <br />nearby areas. Hydraulic conductivities for the Yoest alluvial wells range from .03 to <br />5.95 ft/day (geometrie mean of 0.41 ft/day), while storativity values range from 0.001 to <br />0.17 (geometric mean of 0.01). These are reasonable values for alluvial materiel, <br />although the figures for Yells TSAL1 end 12 seem a bit high (Table 7-9). <br />Madge Overburden. Aquifer tests of three Madge overburden wells yield transmissivities of <br />0.016 to 0.051 ft2/day (0.029 geometric mean), end hydraulic conductivities of 0.001 to <br />0.004 ft/day (0.001 geometric mean). Caleuleted values of these two parameters for the <br />nearby Seneca II-Y Mine are 0.32 to 0.72 ft2/day end 0.003 to 0.5 ft/day, respectively. <br />Robson end Stewart (1990) give values of 4.3 to 43 ft2/day (16.9 ft2/day geometric mean) <br />for transmissivity, and 0.1 to 0.6 ft/day (0.31 ft/day geometric mean) for hydraulic <br />• conductivity for this unit, and Stewart (1983) states a range of 3.1 to 43 ft2/day for <br />transmissivity alone (Table 7-11). These data suggest that the Yoast Madge overburden <br />wells are at or below the extreme low end of the local scale for both of these aquifer <br />characteristics. Storativity values ere also toward the low end at 1 x 10E-05. <br />Madge Coel. Four aquifer tests were performed on the Yoast Yedge coal CYells YY23, 2B, <br />29, and 30). Computed values for transmissivity range from 0.024 to 0.26 ft2/day <br />(geometric mean of 0.06 ft2/day), while hydr eulic conductivity ranges from 0.001 to 0.004 <br />ft/day (geometric mean of 0.002 ft/day). These values compere favorably with those <br />obtained at the Seneca II-Y Mine, but ere et the low end of the range of values determined <br />for the region by the USGS (see Table 7-11). <br />Madge Underburden. Calculated transmissivities and hydraulic conductivities for the Madge <br />underburden are 0.024 to 0.126 ft2/day and 1x10E-OL to 1x10E-03 ft/day, respectively, for <br />three aquifer tests performed et Yoest. These are very much lower than published aquifer <br />characteristics for this unit (refer to Table 7-11). <br />. Yolf Creek Coel. A single pumping test et Yell YYC31 yielded a transmissivity of 0.33 <br />ft2/day, and a hydraulic conductivity of 0.013 ft/day. Similar tests conducted by Peebody <br />et its Seneca lI-4 Mine yielded values of 0.001 to 0.2 ft2/day end 1x10E-04 to 0.01 <br />35 <br />