My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE46234
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE46234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:48:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 07 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• TABLE 7.33 <br />Summery of Trilineer Diegrem end <br />Schoeller Plot Analyses <br />Steam Site Summery Discussion <br />YSS1 ; appreciable cation scatter <br />Two water types, printipel water type is CaMgHC0 <br /> 3 <br /> with trend towards increasing Ca in 1981 end 1982; some anion scatter, <br /> Schoeller plots indicate most of the anion scatter due to 504 variability; no <br /> overall iD5 trend. <br />YSS F3 ; minimal cation scatter; <br />Two water types, principal water type is CeMBHC0 <br /> 3 <br /> Considerable anion scatter, most of anion scatter due to S04 variability; <br /> trend towards higher TD5 from Spring to fall. <br />YS52 ; some cation scatter <br />SO <br />Five water types, principal water type is CeMgHC0 <br /> 3 <br />4 <br /> end appreciable anion scatter with no persistent trends, majority of cation <br /> variability, respectively; no TDS [rend. <br />and anion scatter due to Ne and S0 <br /> 4 <br />W55 F3 ; negligible cation scatter <br />Two water types, principal water types CeMg50 <br />HC0 <br /> 3 <br />4 <br /> values ere gross <br />but measurable anion scatter; the 10/14/92 50 <br />and NC0 <br /> 4 <br />3 <br /> laboratory errors end quite evident on Trilinear plot; the 5/6/93 analysis <br />• discrepancy is not evident on the triLinear diagram, but Schoeller plot shows <br /> this analysis to be the lowest meg/l concentrations for ell 8 anelytes, this <br /> analysis is suspect. Cl and S04 have [he greatest degree of variability <br /> among the anions. There is a trend towards higher TDS from Spring to Fall. <br />YSS4 ; some ration scatter <br />Four water types, printipel water type is CaMBHC0 <br />SO <br /> 3 <br />4 <br /> end appreciable anion scatter; most of Cation scatter is from Ca cone. <br /> conc. variability <br />variability end a majority of the anion scatter is from S0 <br /> 4 <br /> es shown on the Schoeller plot. No overall TDS trend. Seasonally mean TDS <br /> levels ere similar in the Spring end Summer and increase approximately 60-70 <br /> mB/l in the FeIL end Pinter. <br />Y553 ; appreciable cation end <br />Five water types, principal water type is MBCa50 <br />X00 <br /> 4 <br />3 <br /> anion acetter with no overall trend; a majority of the cation scatter is due <br /> to increases in Mg and Ne while the anion scatter largely results from <br /> increasing 50 <br />and decreasing HC0 <br />concentrations. iDS appears to increase <br /> 3 <br />4 <br /> in early Spring, then decrease into fete Spring end increase throughout the <br /> Summer and Fall. <br /> <br />101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.