My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE46234
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE46234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:48:28 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 07 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eg = mean basin elevation minus 5,000 per 1,000 feet (tt) <br />Sg = mean basin slope (ft/ft) <br />end, <br />e, b1, b2, b3, and b4 are regression coefficients. <br />Using this repression model, the mean annual discharge end peek discharges for the 2-, 5-, <br />10-, 25-, 50-, end 100-year recurrence intervals were predicted for each drainage at the <br />following locations: 1) 011 tributary et its confluence with Grassy Lreek; 2) Y-1 <br />tributary et its confluence with Sage Creek; 3) T-2 tributary at fts confluence with Sage <br />Creek; 4) Y-3 tributary et its confluence with Sege Creek; 5) Annend Draw et its <br />confluence with the wofstger Zeigler Reservoir outlet; 6) Sage Lreek approximately one <br />mile below Sage Lreek Reservoir; and 7) Grassy Creek at Site YSGFS. Table 7-30 presents <br />the repression equations end coefficients assigned for each discharge characteristic based <br />on the northwestern region regression model (Kircher et el., 1985). Table 7.31 shows the <br />results of the calculations for each drainage. In eLl cases, the annual mean end various <br />regression model recurrence interval discharges increase with increasing watershed area, <br />irrespective of mean basin elevations. <br />• <br /> • <br />snovmelt. Significant accumulations of snow can be expected to occur in the watersheds <br />draining the Toast mining area. A very significant portion of the annual runoff to <br />streamflow is from snovmelt. A sAries of snow surveys were conducted during winter and <br />early spring, 1980 in a similar watershed at the Seneca II-Y Mine, which is located <br />approximately two mites west and at comparable elevations to the Yoast Mine. The details <br />of the snow surveys are described and documented in the Seneca II-Y mining permit <br />application (Peabody Yestern Coal Company, 1991). The effects of snovmelt are not <br />strictly limited to the melting of the accumv(ated snowpack. Bank storage, frozen ground, <br />end saturated coil conditions ell contribute to changing the response of the watersheds to <br />rainfall events during a portion of the spring season, extending beyond the visible <br />snovmelt period. For the purposes of this tab, the use of the term snovmelt shall include <br />runoff responses to rainfall during snovmelt influenced periods following the melting of <br />the snowpeck. <br />Streamt low. Thie section presents discussions of ctreamf low data (both instantaneous end <br />continuous) collected et stream monitoring sites associated with the Yoest Mine (ell site <br />IDs starting with a Y) and two (site IDs start with a Y) associated with the Seneca f2-Y • <br />Mine, but located on Sege Creek. The discussions are grouped according to the drainage in - <br />which the sites have been located. Thus, Sites YgSF3, Y552, YssF 1, wssF3, end wSS4 ere <br />92 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.