Laserfiche WebLink
flows For the last several years 1'he poor flows help indicate that the sources arc more local and <br />dependent on precipitation rather than a dceper aquifer l~hus, ground water recharge could be <br />impacted in the northern portion ol'the pit <br />\4itieation <br />-It is the county's responsibility to obtain necessan~ Stormwater permits Inxn the !?I'r\ pour to <br />beginning any surface disturbances <br />= fo help minimize the possibility of interrupting the ground water recharge, the northern portion <br />o1'thc pit f I SO' Ikrm the north boundary) should hace ± Icet of gravel Ictt in place at the bottom <br />ot'the pit 'I'hc gravel htycr should basicalh~ continue to act as a french drain For ground water <br />-Proper retiseling locations should be designed to minimize soil contamination and any spills <br />promptly cleaned up <br />finding nn the Public Land I lealth Standard lirr water quality The general area is <br />considered to he meeting this standard \\'ith best ntanagentcnt practices and ti~lluwing the <br />cooditiuns of all required permits. water quality would continue to meet this standard <br />N'1•:I'I.ANDS K ItIPARI:'1N ZOKI?S (snclud~sa fiudmgwr Standard :I <br />:1t1'ectcd tinvironment fhe proposed pit is located within an upland area and does not <br />contain ur adjoin arn~ wetland or riparian zones <br />f?nvironmcntal Conseyuenccs'Alitigation I3y protecting water quality and leaving a <br />gravel layer in the very northern portion ufthe pit. there would be no eepectcd oftsite impacts to <br />otlhite vactland areas (Sec N'alcr (luality Secuonl <br />I~inding on the 1'uhlie Land Health Standard fix riparian systems N'A <br />