Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• Mr. Larry E. O'Brian <br />September 3, 1981 <br />Page -2- <br />mill agree to the elopes as shown on the reclamation map <br />with the erosion control measures outlined in the application. <br />~2o Bco's <br />Tha information you provided regarding the motive for ROBOC's <br />original application ie somewhat disappointing and worrisome <br />to the staff. Wa certainly hope, and believe, that ROBOC's R°~`O5 <br />present applications are written not only far the reason of <br />compliance with governmental regulations but also with a <br />serious attitude and concern for reclaiming the environments <br />which era disturbed by their mining operations. <br />2) The operator should note that if, in the distant future, the <br />end use of this land changes from pasture to residential, an <br />ama.+,t,,,ant to the permit must be filed. This ie in reference <br />to the City of Lakewood's letter of August 24, 1981, which <br />requested that the reclamation of this site ba suitable for <br />residential development (see RULE 2.12 (Sb)). <br />Exhibit G - Water Information <br />• Has the operator conducted a study of the local ground water <br />system to determine if a hydrologic connection with any nearly <br />wells (particularly the Mount Carbon Water and Sanitation <br />Diatrict'a adjudicated well mentioned in George Alan Holley S <br />Aseociatea letter of August 24, 1981) or springs exists? <br />Exhibit L - Reclamation Costa <br />1) Tha staff agrees with the proposed reclamation coat on the <br />assumption that at no time will more than 62.25 acres be <br />disturbed and of this 62.25 acres a maximum of 22.1 acres <br />will be elopes. <br />If you have any questions/comments please do aot hesitate to contact James <br />McArdle or myself. <br />Sincerely, <br />Jay Lucas <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />JL:ye <br />• <br />