Laserfiche WebLink
A PPEND7X A <br />• The laboratory investigation consisted of performing <br />remolded triaxial tests. The laboratory lest results ~,rc <br />presented on Figures Al and A2. The remolded triaxial <br />compression tests were conducted on bulk disturbed samples <br />obtained by Mr. Steve Self and received in our laboratory, <br />Testing <br />Triaxial Compression tests were pert~rmcd on rcmulLl L:d <br />samples remolded to about 100 and l10 puurlls per c•ul,ic~ f""„cat <br />dry density for the anticipated foundation soils. TtI T~ tL•st:s <br />performed were consolidated undrained with pore pressur,~ <br />measurements. The interpreted failure of the samE~lc, lln- <br />our analysis, was taken at a strain of about two (?) p~~rc~~nt_ <br />• Ultimate failure occurred at strains from two (2) t~ I.t~xL:r~ <br />(3) percent. The triaxial compression t:est:: wero h~•r~~rmcd <br />in general accordance with ASTM D2850. 'P;iaxtal cum(,z~•r.~,on <br />test results arc presented on Fiyurc Al arl rl A7. <br />AA-1 <br />M85021GE <br />• <br />~Latnbert AttD ~rs~ociater~ <br />CONSULTING GEOTECH NIGL EN GIN EENS ANU <br />M ATE DIAL TESTING <br />