Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• <br />Table III. Optional Responses to National Register Criteria <br />NRHP Eligibility Optional Response <br />1. Integrity a. Questionable <br />of Location b. Yes: site location is unimpaired, site <br />location is original. <br />c. No: site location is impaired; site hes <br />been moved by equipment, erosion. <br />2. Integrity a. NA (not applicable): for sites lacking <br />of design design features such as rock art, archi- <br />tectural ornamentation, cairns, or diag- <br />nostic tools. <br />3. Integrity of <br />Setting <br />4. Integrity of <br />Material <br />5. Integrity of <br />Workmanship <br />b. Yes: site design characteristics are <br />unimpared. <br />c. No: design characteristics are impaired. <br />d. Unknown <br />c. No: site setting has been altered or changed by other <br />than natural agents. <br />(setting is usually not applicable for cultural sites <br />important for their information content.) <br />a. Unknown <br />b. Yes: site setting is unimpaired. <br />a. Excellent: cultural materials, levels, <br />features are unimpaired, have not been <br />collected, trampled, remodeled, or moved by erosion. <br />b. Good: some disturbance. <br />c. Poor: considerably disturbed. <br />a. Excellent: workmanship is unimpaired; <br />materials are a representation of the <br />original workmanship (if known). <br />b. Good: some disturbance, alteration or <br />modification. <br />c. Poor: workmanship is identifiable, but has been <br />significantly altered. <br />d. NA: for sites lacking features, <br />structures. <br />e. Unknown <br />• 6. Integrity of a. Excellent: there is a positive cor- <br />Association relation between cultural materials <br />