My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE45544
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE45544
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:23:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/25/2005
Doc Name
Objections to Amended Appl
From
Hayes Phillips Hoffmann & Carberry PC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tom Schreiner <br />May 25, 2005 <br />Page 12 <br />• The applicant must apply for and receive an approved, valid, Highway Access Permit from <br />the County prior to initiating any operations. <br />VIII. SUMMARY <br />Black Hawk respectfully requests the Board deny the applicant's Regular (112) Construction <br />Materials Operation Reclamation Permit File No. M-2004-067, based on the following non- <br />compliance with the MLRB Rules and Acts: <br />1. The application is not complete per items listed below: <br />a. The applicant has not obtained the required permits, licenses, and approvals. <br />b. The applicant has not provided engineering to show structures within 200 feet ofthe <br />highway access road will not be damaged, or obtained a notarized letter from the <br />structure owners for making the applicant accountable for paying compensation for <br />damage to the structures caused by mining operations. <br />c. The applicant has not provided information to show Black Hawk's water rights will <br />not be injured by the mining operation. <br />d. The applicant has not provided an environmental assessment of the project area. <br />e. The applicant has not provided adequate information to evaluate the proposed <br />sedimentation ponds and drainage channels. <br />f. The applicant's Reclamation Plan is incomplete as documented in ERO letter <br />(attached). <br />2. The information required by the MLRB Rules, including evidence that the operation will <br />comply with the applicable ground water performance standards under Rule 3, was not <br />provided by the applicant. <br />The information required by the MLRB Rules because the operation is expected to directly <br />affect the ground water system (MLRB Rules, §6.4.7(2), has not been provided by the <br />applicant. <br />4. Cottonwood Creek is within the proposed site boundaries. The application incorrectly states <br />that "There are no perennial streams ... on the permit property." Exhibit G does not <br />correctly reflect these facts. <br />5. Based on the information presented above, major impacts to the hydrologic balance and <br />ground water system will occur during reclamation; therefore, the application does not <br />comply with CMLR Act 34-32-116(7). <br />6. The applicant has not yet applied for or obtained a NPDES permit. MLRB Rules require the <br />applicant to either have the NPDES permit in hand or have applied to CDPHE for the <br />necessary NPDES permit at the time of its 112 permit application submittal. <br />LEONARD RICE ENGINEERS. INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.