Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Case No. 94CW036, Findings of Fect, Conclusions of t.aw and <br />Decrec of the Court Approving Absolute and Conditional Ground <br />Water Rights, Plan of Augmentation and for Change of Water Rights, <br />Application of the City of Black Hawk, <br />Page 12 <br />storage at any time during the year when such rights are in priority. Black Hawk shall exercise its <br />FRICO shares so as not to exceed the transferred divertible yields described in paragraph 23.b.(3) <br />above. <br />23.c.. Applicant may not divert its Church Ditch inches or FRiCO shares described in <br />paragraph 19 at an alternate point of diversion unless the rate at which water is to be diverted at the <br />alternate point is physically and legally available at the original Church Ditch Clear Creek diversion <br />point or the Croke Canal Clear Creek diversion point, respectively. Any call made by Applicant on <br />the mainstem of Clear Creek shall be administered at the originally decreed diversion point, not at the <br />altemate point of diversion. Water diverted at the alternate point of diversion shall be considered to <br />be part of the amount of water appropriated for diversion at the originally decreed Clear Creek <br />diversion point. <br />23.c.{ 1) Pursuant to the June 18, 2002 Stipulation by the Applicant with <br />the City of Northglenn and the Church Ditch Company, the following provisions shall apply to the <br />Church Ditch water rights changed in paragraph 19.b(2): <br />23.c.{1)(a) As between the City of Black Hawk and the Church <br />Ditch Company and the City of Northglenn, the City of Black Hawk agrees that the City of Black <br />Hawk will not challenge the validity of the Church Ditch Company rule existing on the date of this <br />stipulation which requires that water be first diverted into the Church Ditch for measurement and <br />payment of pro rata ditch losses assessed by the Church Ditch Company before discharge through an <br />augmentation station on Church Ditch back to Clear Creek to allow diversion at other points of <br />diversion for the 7235 inches changed in this case so long as the Church Ditch Company fairly and <br />uniformly enforces this rule (unless precluded from doing so by a subsequent final order of a court of <br />competent jurisdiction issued in an action brought against the owners of the Church Ditch and/or the <br />Church Ditch Company by a third party) against all Church Ditch inches diverting at other points of <br />diversion, whether those other points are upstream or downstream of the Church Ditch Clear Creek <br />point of diversion. The Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction hereunder to resolve any disputes <br />that may arise among the parties hereto regarding the uniformity of enforcement of this rule by the <br />Church Ditch Company. <br />23.c.(])(b) Black Hawk will allow to remain in the Church Ditch' <br />such percentage of its Church Ditch inches as may be from time to time determined by the Church <br />Ditch Company board of directors to be required to compensate for the reduction in the ability of the <br />Church Ditch to carry water to its inchholders paused by the removal of Black Hawk's inches from <br />carriage by the ditch, provided that percentage shall be equal to that imposed upon al] inchholders. <br />