My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE45266
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE45266
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:47:39 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 12:16:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
2.7 FISH & WILDLIFE
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Aerial observations during The winter of 1980 (Table 2.7-5) showed that nearly <br />• all elk had left the area by late November. Most elk from the aspen area along <br />Center Ridge moved west towards Middle Creek and the Twentymile Park area. Elk <br />from the Moffat Area moved either west towards Twentymile Park or east into the <br />Oak Creek drainage. A small herd of elk in the mountain brush area, north of the <br />Moffat Area, remained through the winter. <br />No areas which could be classified as critical elk wintering areas were located <br />within one mile of the area To be mined. The deep snows which commonly occur in <br />the area (up to 5 feet on the level) ore the primary reason why the animals leave <br />the area. This observation is substantiated by Jim Hicks (Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife per Comm. 1979) who has observed the movements of the elk in the area <br />for several years. <br />Mule deer are common and were observed using all fiabitoT types on the <br />property. However, total deer numbers observed both on and off the property are <br />low. This is in line with the general overall trend of the deer population in the <br />region. The primary reason for deer populations remaining low in the area is the lack <br />of sufficient winter range to sustain larger herds (Hicks, Colorado Division of <br />• Wildlife, personal communication). The amount of winter range, not spring through <br />fall range, controls the deer herds in the area. As a result of deep snows, no winter <br />range exists on or near the permit area. Aerial and ground observations during the <br />winter of 1979 - 1980 (Table 2.7-6) showed that by mid-December, all deer had <br />moved from the permit area due to deep snows. <br />Because the deer population in the ores is kept in check by the amount of <br />winter range, their numbers remain well below what the area con support the <br />remainder of the year. <br />The high count during the studies was thirteen animals (Table 2.7-6). Assuming <br />only one third of the deer were observed, approximately forty animals are expected <br />to occur in the Moffat Lease area. A similar number (40) probably will occur to the <br />east in the area immediately adjacent to the mine. <br />Using the accepted SCS number that an adult male deer is equal to .20 AUM <br />then 16+ AUM's would be required to sustain the 80+ deer occurring on and adjacent <br />to the permit area. The SCS in Steamboat Springs has determined that twelve acres <br />are required for each AUM in the mountain shrub communities such as Those which <br />occur on the property. Thus, 192 + acres of the mountain shrub habitat type would <br />• be required To support the deer. <br />Revised 7-81 2.7-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.