Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DECISION NOTICE <br />AND <br />FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT <br />Mule Creek Gravel Pit <br />USDA Forest Service <br />Pike and San Isabel National Forests, <br />Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands <br />Pikes Peak Ranger Distici <br />Teller County, Colorodo <br />INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND <br />PK Enterprises. [nc., (PKE) has submitted s Special-Use Application to the Pike Nations) <br />Forest proposing to remove gravel from a previously developed quarry (Mule Creek <br />Gravel Pi[) locazed about four miles south of Divide on [he east side of Colorado State <br />Highway 67 in Teller County. The czisting abandoned quarry site is located party <br />within the Pike National Forest and p•,tttly on private land and is immediately adjacent to <br />the F{ighway 67 entrance to Mueller State Park. Under the proposed action, the applicant <br />would develop and rec)aim the site in three phases: 1) pre-production site preparation: <br />2) production; and 3) reclamation. Part of the reclatna[ion phase would be implemented <br />concurrently wi[h production. <br />Aggregate from the Mule Greek Gravel Pit would be used for road maintenance and <br />construction in Teller County. The mining of the Mule Creek Gravel Pit would allow for <br />the reclamation of a site that is currently abandoned, is subject to excessive erosion and <br />creates undesirable visual impacts. As the Forest Service does not have the resources to <br />reclaim the site under czisting conditions, the proposed action provides an unique <br />opportunity for its reclamation while also serving the need for a~rcgate in Teller <br />County. The proposed reclamation for the Mule Creek Gravel Pit would return the land <br />to a more nazural condition by creating more natural contours and restoring vegetation. <br />Under the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) for <br />implementation of the NEPA, an Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared to <br />determine whether the proposed action may cause significant environmental impacts (40 <br />CFR I500). The EA identified and evaluated two alternatives to the action proposed by <br />PKE. This Decision Notice describes the Foust Service evaluazioa of these altemazives <br />and responds to PKE's proposal. <br />