Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Indian problems. By 1821 when trade opened between the United States and Mexico, the frontier <br />' outposts appeaz to have been affected less extensively than the main population centers such as Santa <br />Fe and Taos. The frontiersmen already had access to the necessary items which they obtained <br />through their relationships with the Plains Indians, particularly the Comanche and Ute. Patterns of <br />' trade among Indian groups were well established when the Spanish arrived. The latter group and <br />their descendants adopted these pattems and methods, which continued despite the political changes <br />occurring in the Southwest (Kenner 1969; Weber 1982). Only in the early 1860s in the outlying <br />' areas did the pattems begin to change, as the impact expanded from the population centers in Santa <br />Fe and Taos into the southern Colorado region. <br />The Research Design <br />' The observations at SLA7186 are somewhat tentative and can be considered a working <br />hypothesis. They do, however, provide sufficient information to enable a general research <br />' framework to be developed to serve as a research design. The research design is preliminary in that <br />general research questions are presented for purposes of developing a contextual framework to use <br />in determining the site's National Register eligibility. Using data from the three RP3 contexts, <br />' Colorado Southern Frontier Historic Context (Mehls 1984), Colorado Urbanization and Planning <br />Context (Hill 1984), and the Colorado Historical Archaeology Context (Buckles and Buckles 1984), <br />and information from historical archaeology previously undertaken in the Spanish borderlands <br />regions of southern Colorado and northern New Mexico (Carrillo ] 985, 1986, 1990, 1994; Camllo <br />et al. 1993, 1995, 1997; Hardesty et al. 1995; and others) a preliminary research design is presented. <br />' With regard to sites associated with the former Hispanic New Mexican migrations into the <br />San Luis Valley in the 19th century, Mehls (1984) and Hill (1984) offer assessments. Mehls (1984) <br />indicates that the data are insufficient to determine the number and condition of resources that exist <br />' or once existed. He goes on to add: <br />Numerous examples of different cultural resources associated with the theme exist today in the region <br />' including adobe buildings of all kinds, corrals for breaking and threshing, fences, walls, churches, and <br />chapels. However, many of the original plazas, settlements, and associated structures no longer exist, <br />and no systematic survey has been done to identify those in good condition and the location of the <br />' ruins of former settlements. Although some cemeteries are still used, in other cases they are not well <br />marked or the markers have totally disappeared from the surface. None of the town squares are in <br />current use, but several are still recognizable. Several early settlements are well preserved and <br />' maintained. <br />Hill (1984) also offers an assessment on these types of sites: <br />' The condition of these resottrces is likely to be highly variable. Time and an aggressive Anglo culture <br />will have taken their toll. Plazas likely will be compromised, adobe will have been washed way, old <br />' curved roads may have been straightened, the varas system will be adapted to modem agricultural <br />machinery, and commons may be reused for various new purposes. On the othcr hand, many towns <br />. may be in remarkably good shape due to their isolation and maintenance of old ways. It is important <br />to find out. <br />