Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Memo to Wallace Erickson 10 May 3 3001 <br />Flood storage in the pre-mining alluvium is equal to the pore space available in the alluvium above the <br />water table. Atypical sand and gravel deposit will have approximately 35 percent voids (Davis, 1969), <br />so the total pre-mining flood storage available over the approximately 1 1 acres that will become pond <br />surface may be calculated as: <br />1 lacres x 43,560 ft Z / acre x 5 fee[ x 0.35 = 838,530cu. ft. = 19.25acre -fee[ <br />This is a conservatively high estimate of flood storage in the pre-mine setting, since the upper two feet of <br />the deposit is topsoil and overburden with a lower void ratio than sand and gravel. <br />Flood storage provided by freeboard in the north pond is: <br />2.3 lacres x 3 feet = 6.93acre -feel <br />Flood storage provided by freeboard in the north pond is: <br />3.37acres x 0.5 feel = 1.685acre -feel <br />Flood storage provided by freeboard in the south pond is: <br />5.38acres x 2 feet =10.7bacre -feel <br />Total flood storage provided by freeboard in the post mining configuration is estimated at 19.38 acre- <br />feet, demonstrating that mining, reclamation, and pond filling will not create a reduction in flood storage <br />in the pit area. <br />Another flood related concern with the excavation of the Line Camp Pit would be the potential for <br />scouring of the land berm between the pit and the river during a flood and potentially creating a new <br />flow path for the river through the excavated pits. If this were to happen, down cutting of the main <br />stream channel may result in property damage upstream and downstream of the pit location. The <br />common nomenclature for the land berm between a gravel pit and the river is to call it a "riverbank <br />berm." Concerns with the potential for failure of riverbank berms have prompted Urban Drainage and <br />Flood Control District in Denver and the DMG to issue guidance documents addressing this issue <br />(UDFCD, 1987 and DMG. 1998). One of the protective measures described in both of the guidance <br />documents is to leave a specified minimum crest width from the bank of the river to the edge of the pit. <br />The crest width requirements are specified to protect the riverbank berms from rapid failure during <br />floods. The crest width requirements consider long term stability and safety along streams, but are not <br />necessarily preventative of localized damages to the berms during large floods. Such localized damages <br />may be maintained and/or repaired during low flow. This is a particularly straight forward process on <br />rivers with hydrographs like the Dolores, as will be discussed below. <br />Along the South Platte River through Adams County Colorado, gravel operators are allowed to mine <br />with a 400 foot crest width on the riverbank berm with no other bank armoring or spillway installation <br />required. The 400 foot crest width is the extreme case in terms of setback requirements imposed on <br />gravel mining operators in the State of Colorado. Operators are allowed to mine much closer to the <br />South Platte River in Adams County if they install mitigation measures. By comparison, the Applicant <br />for the Line Camp Pit has proposed mining to within 500 feet of the Dolores River at the north or <br />upstream end of the permit area, and to within 200 feet along a short section of river at the south end of <br />