Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />u <br />Compaction <br />Test Report <br />cuErlr BASIN RESOURCES, INC. <br />14300 HIGHWAY 12 <br />WESTON, COLORADO 81091 <br />® CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL <br />AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS <br />DATE _ 08/27/95 ~oB No 22905 _. <br />REPOmNO . _ 2 $HEEr 1 of . _ 2 _ <br />sue~ECr FIELD DENSITY TESTS <br /> UBORAlORY FIELD <br />ZEST DEPTH TEST MAX OMC DRY MC COM- <br />NO. LOCATION FEEL LVPE DENSITY .e DENSITY .a PACTIO SOIL TYPE <br /> PCF PCF <br /> 1 <br /> CURVE NO. 2 <br />9 GOLDEN EAGLE RDA 6921 NUC 113.0 9.0 121.0 13.0 7 00 JOB N0.22905 <br /> _ _ _ ___ _ CURVE NO. 2 <br />10 GOLDEN EAGLE RDA 6922 NUC 113.0 9.0 121.0 4.3 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> _ ______________ CURVEN0.2 <br />11 GOLDEN FAGLE RDA 6920 NUC 113.0 9.0 114.0 7.5 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> NEW ELKMINE___ __ CURVE NO. 3 <br />12 DEVELOPMENT WAST PILE 7225 NUC 88.5 10.0 96.0 7.5 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> NEW ELK MINE CURVE NO.. 3 _ <br />13 DEVELOPMENT WASTE PILE 7230 NUC 88.5 10.0 91.0 3.7 100 JOB N0.22905 <br /> NEW ELK MINE ___ CURVE NO. 3- <br />14 DEVELOPMENT WASTE PILE 7235 NUC 88.5 10.0 88.0 9.1 99 JOB N0.22905 <br /> _ CURVE NO. 4 <br /> <br />15 _ <br />___ <br />NEW ELK RDA <br />7365 <br />NUC <br />99.0 <br />9.5 <br />] 06.0 <br />9.5 <br />100 - <br />JOB N0.22905 <br /> CURVE NO. 4 <br />16 NEW ELK RDA 7393 NUC 99.0 9.5 105.0 6.2 100 JOB N0.22905 <br />T flEVAT10N IN FEET <br />$PECIFICAFIONS:--90-°o OF Mi`(IMUM ~M_D 698 <br />MOISTURE NJIMIN - __ __ °b OF OPTIMUM <br />TYPE Of COMPACTON E9UIPMENi AND NO OF UNITS <br />MOISTURE ADDED By __ <br />iHICKNE55OF LIFT <br />IVPE OF ElU7rH MOVING EOUIPMENi AND NO OF UNITS <br />INCHES <br />LFUS REPORT PRESENr50PINIONS FORMED ASA RESUIL OF OUR OBSERVAItON <br />OF FILL PLACFNIENr. AS WELL A; ME rE515 $HUlJN ABOVE WE F41VE RELIED <br />UPON THE CONLRACTOR i0 APPLV THE NECESSAfrv COMPACrflE EFFORT AND <br />MOISTURE i0 ACHIEVE SPEGFlED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR <br />OBSERVER IS NOr PRESENL. AND Ar LOCAEIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED <br />TEST DATA ARE NOi THE SOLE 8451$ FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEEi$ <br />SPEGFlCAnONS <br />PROCRE5.5 REPORT AS RE9UESTED, WE PERFORMED FIELD DENSiiY TESTS AT THE REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA (RDA) AT <br />THE GOLDEN EAGLE MINE (PESTS 9 THROUGH 11), THE DEVELOPMENT WASTE PILE AT THE NEW ELK MINE (TESTS <br />12 THROUGH 14), AND THE RDA AT THE NEW ELK MINE (TESTS 15 THROUGH 19). ELEVATIONS OF THE TESTS <br />LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED 8Y BUDDY GORDON OF BASIN RESOURCES WffH AN ALTIMETER. <br />^ IN OUR OPINION FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.ISL <br />^ INOUROPINIONFILLCOMPACTIONDOESNOiMEETSPECIFICATIONSASINDICATEDBYOUR085ERVATIONSANDiESiNQISL- <br />AND SHOULD BE REWORKED <br />SCOPE OF OBSERVATION: I] FULL TIME; ;X PERIODIC, ON CALL BAS15; (]( CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE ADVISED <br />PAUL WIGGS <br />FIELD PEPRESFNigINF <br />PW:MW <br />CTLITHOMPSON. INC. <br />;PPapvEe a~ MARK G. GRAY. P.E. <br />BUDDY GORDON <br />(BASIN RESOURCES) <br />