My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE44494
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
500000
>
PERMFILE44494
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:46:57 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:56:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/16/2001
Doc Name
2000 Annual Hydrologic Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 2000 Report Section 2.5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 also presents sulfate concentrations for QR wells. This figure shows that sulfate • <br />concentrations in backfill well GF-11, which is upgradient of QR well GF-6, increased after <br />the large decline in 1996. The values for the last three years are above the earlier peak <br />values. Future monitoring is needed to define the maximum sulfate concentration in this <br />backfill aquifer. The sulfate concentrations have been steady over the last three years in <br />well GF-6, downgradient of well GF-11. Sulfate concentrations for 2000 have also been <br />steady in QR wells GP-5 and GP-6 after a very gradual increasing trend in well GP-5. A5 <br />expected, the sulfate concentrations are greater in downgradient well GP-5. The sulfate <br />values for eastern QR well GP-1 have remained tow and steady through 2000. <br />Figure 8-13 presents the sulfate concentrations for KLM aquifer wells GF-3, GP-2, <br />GP1} and GP-8. Steady sulfate concentrations for the last few years have existed in well <br />GF-3. Sulfate concentrations in eastern wells GP-2 and GP-8 vary significantly but should • <br />be natural due to their location in the eastern portion of the Trapper permit area. A <br />gradual increase in sulfate concentrations in well GP-4 for the last few years is well within <br />natural variations observed in this aquifer. <br />Sulfate concentrations for the HI aquifer wells are presented in Figures B-14 and B- <br />15. The sulfate concentration in wells in the HI aquifer wells in Figure B-14 are fairly <br />similar except for the values in backfill well GF-7, which are substantially greater than <br />those in downgradient well GF-4. Avery gradual increase in sulfate concentration in <br />downgradient well GF-4 has been observed over the last few years. This small increase is <br />well within the natural variation of sulfate concentrations in the HI aquifer but could be due <br />to the effects of the backfill aquifer upgradient. Sulfate concentrations in backfiil well GF-7 <br />significantly decreased during the period of 1995 through 1997 and, overall, have • <br />3-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.